Clinical presentation of CIED infection following initial implant versus reoperation for generator change or lead addition. Issue 1 (30th March 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Clinical presentation of CIED infection following initial implant versus reoperation for generator change or lead addition. Issue 1 (30th March 2018)
- Main Title:
- Clinical presentation of CIED infection following initial implant versus reoperation for generator change or lead addition
- Authors:
- Harper, Mariko W
Uslan, Daniel Z
Greenspon, Arnold J
Baddour, Larry M
Carrillo, Roger G
Danik, Stephan B
Tolosana, Jose M
Le, Katherine
Miro, Jose M
Naber, Christoph K
Peacock, James
Sohail, Muhammad Rizwan
Vikram, Holenarasipur R
Prutkin, Jordan M - Other Names:
- author non-byline.
Prutkin Jordan M author non-byline.
Uslan Daniel Z author non-byline.
Greenspon Arnold J author non-byline.
Sohail M Rizwan author non-byline.
Baddour Larry M author non-byline.
Le Katherine author non-byline.
Carrillo Roger G author non-byline.
Danik Stephan B author non-byline.
Tolosana Jose M author non-byline.
Miro Jose M author non-byline.
Ninot S author non-byline.
Rio x castañeda A Del author non-byline.
Marco F author non-byline.
De la maría C García author non-byline.
Cervera C author non-byline.
Armero Y author non-byline.
Almela M author non-byline.
Paré C author non-byline.
Moreno A author non-byline.
Mont L author non-byline.
Mestres C author non-byline.
Blank Elisabeth author non-byline.
Naber Christoph author non-byline.
Peacock James author non-byline.
Vikam Holenarasipur R author non-byline. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To explore differences in clinical manifestations and outcomes in those patients who develop infection after undergoing initial implantation versus reoperation. Methods: We compared cases of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection based on initial implantation versus reoperation from 11 centres. Results: There were 432 patients with CIED infection, 178 occurring after initial device placement and 254 after repeat reoperation. No differences were seen in age, sex or device type. Those with infection after initial implant had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Score (median 3 (IQR 2–6) vs 2 (IQR 1–4), p<0.001), shorter time since last procedure (median 8.9 months (IQR 0.9–33.3) vs 19.5 months (IQR 1.1–62.9), p<0.0001) and fewer leads (2.0±0.6vs 2.5±0.9, p<0.001). Pocket infections were more likely to occur after a reoperation (70.1%vs48.9%, p<0.001) and coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) was the most frequently isolated organism in this group (p=0.029). In contrast, initial implant infections were more likely to present with higher white cell count (10.5±5.1 g/dL vs 9.5±5.4 g/dL, p=0.025), metastatic foci of infection (16.9%vs8.7%, p=0.016) and sepsis (30.9%vs19.3%, p=0.006). There were no differences in in-hospital (7.9%vs5.2%, p=0.31) or 6-month mortality (21.9%vs14.0%, p=0.056). Conclusions: CIED infections after initial device implant occur earlier, more aggressively, and often due to Staphylococcus aureus . In contrast, CIED infectionsAbstract : Objective: To explore differences in clinical manifestations and outcomes in those patients who develop infection after undergoing initial implantation versus reoperation. Methods: We compared cases of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection based on initial implantation versus reoperation from 11 centres. Results: There were 432 patients with CIED infection, 178 occurring after initial device placement and 254 after repeat reoperation. No differences were seen in age, sex or device type. Those with infection after initial implant had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Score (median 3 (IQR 2–6) vs 2 (IQR 1–4), p<0.001), shorter time since last procedure (median 8.9 months (IQR 0.9–33.3) vs 19.5 months (IQR 1.1–62.9), p<0.0001) and fewer leads (2.0±0.6vs 2.5±0.9, p<0.001). Pocket infections were more likely to occur after a reoperation (70.1%vs48.9%, p<0.001) and coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) was the most frequently isolated organism in this group (p=0.029). In contrast, initial implant infections were more likely to present with higher white cell count (10.5±5.1 g/dL vs 9.5±5.4 g/dL, p=0.025), metastatic foci of infection (16.9%vs8.7%, p=0.016) and sepsis (30.9%vs19.3%, p=0.006). There were no differences in in-hospital (7.9%vs5.2%, p=0.31) or 6-month mortality (21.9%vs14.0%, p=0.056). Conclusions: CIED infections after initial device implant occur earlier, more aggressively, and often due to Staphylococcus aureus . In contrast, CIED infections after reoperation occur later, are due to CoNS, and have more indolent manifestations with primary localisation to the pocket. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Open heart. Volume 5:Issue 1(2018)
- Journal:
- Open heart
- Issue:
- Volume 5:Issue 1(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 5, Issue 1 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0005-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2018-03-30
- Subjects:
- permanent pacemaker -- implantable cardioverter-defibrillator -- endocarditis
Cardiology -- Periodicals
Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Heart -- Diseases -- Patients -- Periodicals
616.12005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://openheart.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000681 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2398-595X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18063.xml