A comparison of endothelial and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes following failed penetrating keratoplasty: a registry study. Issue 11 (18th February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Keane, Miriam C; Galettis, Rachel A; Mills, Richard A D; Coster, Douglas J; Williams, Keryn A
• Is Part Of: British journal of ophthalmology. Volume 100:Issue 11(2016)
• Page Start: 1569
• Page End: 1575
• Publication Date: 2016-02-18
• Subjects: Cornea; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; 617.7
• DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307792
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1161

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: To compare graft survival and visual outcomes for endothelial keratoplasty (EK) after a first penetrating keratoplasty (PK), with outcomes of repeat PK after a first PK. Methods: 400 eyes with a second graft (65 EKs, 335 PKs) performed after failure of a primary PK were identified through the Australian Corneal Graft Registry, a national prospectively followed cohort. Grafts were performed after January 2008 (follow-up of the second graft extending to 6.75 years maximum). Kaplan–Meier graft survival plots were constructed and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent risk factors for graft failure. Best-corrected Snellen visual acuity (BCVA) at last follow-up was compared with pregraft acuity. Results: Poor Kaplan–Meier graft survival was observed for PK-EK compared with PK-PK (log-rank=29.66, p<0.001). Variables retained in multivariate analysis as significantly influencing survival of the second graft included graft type (PK-EK or PK-PK, p<0.001), length of survival of the previous PK (global p=0.011), graft era (global p=0.018), occurrence of rejection in the second graft (p=0.005) and a history of raised intraocular pressure at any time (p=0.048), but not indication for the first graft. BCVA improved in the majority of surviving grafts and attainment of 6/12 vision was similar for both PK-EK and PK-PK groups. Conclusions: Our registry findings suggest that repeat PK may deliver a better outcome in terms of graft survival than EK after a failed PK that was performed initially for keratoconus or pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. For surviving grafts, visual outcomes appeared equivalent across groups.