G550(P) Rna sequencing and dna methlyation profiling of paired recurrent paediatric ependymomas reveals immunological changes specific to molecular subgroups. (May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ritzmann, TA; Rogers, HA; Donson, AM; Paine, SML; Virasami, A; Jacques, TS; Foreman, NK; Grundy, RG
• Is Part Of: Archives of disease in childhood. Volume 104:(2019)Supplement 2
• Page Start: A222
• Page End: A223
• Publication Date: 2019-05
• Subjects: Children -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Infants -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 618.920005
• DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-rcpch.533
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-9888

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Ependymoma is the third most common childhood brain tumour. Relapse is common and associated with extremely poor outcomes. Current therapeutic strategies for the treatment of this poor prognosis tumour are inadequate but understanding of the underlying biology of the disease is improving with recent descriptions of numerous ependymoma subgroups (particularly EPN_PFA, EPN_PFB, EPN_RELA and EPN_YAP1). Additionally, the immune system has been implicated in recurrence but its role needs further definition to inform therapy. Methods: We profiled two independent paediatric ependymoma cohorts using RNA sequencing and Illumina 450K DNA methylation arrays; one from fresh frozen (FF), and the other from paraffin embedded (FFPE), material. FF and FFPE cohorts contained 27 and 25 matched primary and recurrent pairs respectively. Tumour samples were obtained from the Children's Cancer and Leukaemia group (CCLG) and all of our work had ethical approval. Following differential expression (DEA) and gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA), we used validated algorithms to calculate parameters associated with anti-tumour immune responses, including: immunophenoscore (IPS), cytolytic activity (CYT), and expression of immune checkpoint genes. Results: Clustering using RNA-seq data from primary and recurrent tumours formed location based groups. Posterior fossa (PF) clusters formed two groups, PF1 and PF2, with expression patterns similar to EPN_PFA and EPN_PFB tumours, however, both contained predominantly EPN_PFA DNA methylation designations. GSEA comparing primary to first relapse was similar in FF and FFPE cohorts. PF1 demonstrated treatment independent downregulation of inflammatory responses, cytokine activity and chemotaxis. Radiotherapy treated PF1 relapses were associated with upregulation of immune related ontologies. PF2 and ST relapses showed upregulation of B- and T-cell ontologies. IPS did not change at recurrence, and was below levels associated with response to checkpoint inhibition. CYT and expression of checkpoint inhibition molecules were low. Discussion and conclusions : Whilst these independent datasets demonstrated shared immunological changes at recurrence; immune based algorithms indicated that activity may be inadequate to respond to immune checkpoint therapy. Other immunotherapeutic approaches may be effective, but a better understanding of ependymoma's immunological basis is essential to ameliorate the risk of unanticipated responses to therapy.