A review of the use of examples for automating architectural design tasks. (March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sönmez, Nizam Onur
• Is Part Of: Computer aided design. Volume 96(2018)
• Page Start: 13
• Page End: 30
• Publication Date: 2018-03
• Subjects: Example-Based design -- Shape grammars -- Case-Based design -- Similarity based evaluation -- Artificial intelligence in design -- Computer Vision for design; Computer-aided design -- Periodicals; Engineering design -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Computer graphics -- Periodicals; Conception technique -- Informatique -- Périodiques; Infographie -- Périodiques; Computer graphics; Engineering design -- Data processing; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 620.00420285
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2017.10.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0010-4485

Abstract

Abstract: Recent Artificial Intelligence studies have achieved substantial improvements in practical tasks by using extensive amounts of data. We assume that a substantial part of the data to guide artificial design technologies resides in existing design examples. Developing ways to use this data may enable improvements in intelligent design tools, with the hope that these may provide more effective design workflows and more productive design practices. Such improvements may result in more in-depth evaluations of potentials and alternatives for design situations; hence better planning for the spatial environment. Various approaches have been developed to use representations of architectural examples for artificially tackling architectural design tasks. This study presents a review of the historical development of these approaches, with an overall aim to investigate where and how design examples have been used for practical computational design applications. The review encompasses traditional and recent Shape Grammar and Procedural Modeling studies, Case-Based Design, Similarity-Based Evaluation and Design, and recent studies on the architectural uses of Machine Vision, Semantic Modeling, Machine Learning, and Classification. The emphasis of the review is on the studies that aim at designing or generating new design examples, particularly for building layouts, façades, envelopes, and massing. For a comparative evaluation of the current capabilities of the examined lineages of studies, we propose a minimum set of design capabilities, and assess each study through this framework. This reveals the overall patterns of already covered requirements. The review shows that initial hand-operated SGs gave way to automatic generation, which in turn developed into automated SG extraction, through increasing levels of computational capabilities. Case-Based Design has been neglected; however, it can be reinvigorated through novel AI techniques. On the other hand, Similarity-Based Evaluation may complement and balance the orientation towards technical performance. Machine Learning and Computer Vision appear as potential intermediaries for connecting these threads. There are example-based studies towards almost all aspects of artificial design; yet, these have not been tackled adequately or definitively. In particular, dynamic process control is still only a future potential. On the other hand, the examined research lineages have the potential to assume complementary roles for more capable and multifaceted design systems. As an overall result, example-based research perspectives raise important possibilities for intelligent design systems. Highlights: Examples comprise information that can be harnessed for artificial design systems. Automated procedural model extraction can lead to real-time task re-setting. Example-based approaches cover most aspects of artificial design, yet separately. Example-based approaches support the development of intelligent design systems.