Can reference images improve interobserver agreement in reporting liver fibrosis?. Issue 4 (10th November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: German, Alyn L; Fleming, Kenneth; Kaye, Philip; Davies, Susan; Goldin, Robert; Hubscher, Stefan G; Tiniakos, Dina; McGregor, Angus; Wyatt, Judith I
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical pathology. Volume 71:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 368
• Page End: 371
• Publication Date: 2017-11-10
• Subjects: liver disease -- fibrosis -- histopathology -- liver; Pathology -- Periodicals; Pathology, Molecular -- Periodicals; 616.0705
• DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204760
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9746

Abstract

Abstract : Staging of fibrosis in medical liver biopsies has inherent interobserver variability. There are a number of disease-specific scoring systems available. While recognising the importance of these scoring systems, there is scope to consider how concordance amongst histopathologists could be improved using a generic fibrosis staging system. Using virtual slides, we approached both specialist liver histopathologists and general histopathologists from the UK to assess the degree of fibrosis against a proposed four-tiered reporting system. Example reference images were then produced and distributed to the same responders who were asked to rate a second set of slides to assess if the use of reference images improved concordance between pathologists. The use of reference images eliminated spread across three categories (from 15% to 0%). Overall, agreement was already good; our study showed an improved agreement amongst all participants for percentage agreement (67.79% to 70.08%) and interobserver agreement improved (Fleiss' Kappa 0.55 to 0.59).