Revisiting the open-field test: what does it really tell us about animal personality?. (January 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Revisiting the open-field test: what does it really tell us about animal personality?. (January 2017)
- Main Title:
- Revisiting the open-field test: what does it really tell us about animal personality?
- Authors:
- Perals, Daniel
Griffin, Andrea S.
Bartomeus, Ignasi
Sol, Daniel - Abstract:
- Abstract : Animal personality has become a major topic in animal behaviour. Much recent progress has come from the use of the open-field test, which is routinely used to separate individuals into fast and slow explorers. However, there is no standard way to conduct the test and it is unclear whether the test really measures exploration. Here, we addressed these issues by combining an open-field test with a battery of independent assays intended to assess the convergent and discriminant validity of the behavioural traits suggested to measure exploration in the open-field test. Our study subjects were common mynas, Acridotheres tristis, introduced to Australia. The analyses confirmed that the open-field test allows individuals to be separated according to their propensity to explore, mainly through metrics related to spatial and object examination of the novel cage. However, other metrics classically used to describe exploratory behaviour, such as the latency to enter the novel space, reflected shyness rather than exploration. The open-field test can therefore be a powerful tool to investigate personality, but only if the biological meanings of the metrics derived from the test are properly validated with independent behavioural assays. Highlights: Spatial examination and number of pecks reliably predicted exploration in OFT. Individual exploration performances were correlated in line with fast-slow continuum. Essential to use additional tests to measure personality traits inAbstract : Animal personality has become a major topic in animal behaviour. Much recent progress has come from the use of the open-field test, which is routinely used to separate individuals into fast and slow explorers. However, there is no standard way to conduct the test and it is unclear whether the test really measures exploration. Here, we addressed these issues by combining an open-field test with a battery of independent assays intended to assess the convergent and discriminant validity of the behavioural traits suggested to measure exploration in the open-field test. Our study subjects were common mynas, Acridotheres tristis, introduced to Australia. The analyses confirmed that the open-field test allows individuals to be separated according to their propensity to explore, mainly through metrics related to spatial and object examination of the novel cage. However, other metrics classically used to describe exploratory behaviour, such as the latency to enter the novel space, reflected shyness rather than exploration. The open-field test can therefore be a powerful tool to investigate personality, but only if the biological meanings of the metrics derived from the test are properly validated with independent behavioural assays. Highlights: Spatial examination and number of pecks reliably predicted exploration in OFT. Individual exploration performances were correlated in line with fast-slow continuum. Essential to use additional tests to measure personality traits in the OFT. To assess behaviour in the OFT behavioural syndromes should be taken into account. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Animal behaviour. Volume 123(2017)
- Journal:
- Animal behaviour
- Issue:
- Volume 123(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 123, Issue 2017 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 123
- Issue:
- 2017
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0123-2017-0000
- Page Start:
- 69
- Page End:
- 79
- Publication Date:
- 2017-01
- Subjects:
- animal personality -- behavioural assays -- behavioural syndrome -- common mynas -- fast–slow explorers -- neophobia -- open-field test -- validated
Animal behavior -- Periodicals
591.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00033472 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0003-3472;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.10.006 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-3472
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0902.950000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18032.xml