Amygdala volume and social anxiety symptom severity: Does segmentation technique matter?. (30th January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Amygdala volume and social anxiety symptom severity: Does segmentation technique matter?. (30th January 2020)
- Main Title:
- Amygdala volume and social anxiety symptom severity: Does segmentation technique matter?
- Authors:
- Jayakar, Reema
Tone, Erin B.
Crosson, Bruce
Turner, Jessica A.
Anderson, Page L.
Phan, K. Luan
Klumpp, Heide - Abstract:
- Highlights: Freesurfer produced larger amygdala volumes than manual correction did. Freesurfer is likely to position boundaries more liberally when image quality is low. Manual editing procedures that are specific to subcortical structures are valuable. Regardless of segmentation technique, amygdala volume was not associated with social anxiety. Abstract: The amygdala factors prominently in neurobiological models of social anxiety (SA), yet amygdala volume findings regarding SA have been inconsistent and largely focused on case-control characterization. One source of discrepant findings could be variability in volumetric techniques. Therefore, we compared amygdala volumes derived via an automated technique (Freesurfer) against a manually corrected approach, also involving Freesurfer. Additionally, we tested whether the relationship between volume and SA symptom severity would differ across volumetric techniques. We pooled participants ( n = 76) from archival studies. SA severity was assessed with the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale; scores ranged from non-clinical to clinical levels. Freesurfer produced significantly larger amygdalar volumes for participants with poor image quality. Even after excluding such participants, paired sample t -tests showed Freesurfer's boundaries produced significantly larger amygdalar volumes than manually corrected ones, bilaterally. Yet, intra-class correlation coefficients between the two methods were high, which suggests that Freesurfer'sHighlights: Freesurfer produced larger amygdala volumes than manual correction did. Freesurfer is likely to position boundaries more liberally when image quality is low. Manual editing procedures that are specific to subcortical structures are valuable. Regardless of segmentation technique, amygdala volume was not associated with social anxiety. Abstract: The amygdala factors prominently in neurobiological models of social anxiety (SA), yet amygdala volume findings regarding SA have been inconsistent and largely focused on case-control characterization. One source of discrepant findings could be variability in volumetric techniques. Therefore, we compared amygdala volumes derived via an automated technique (Freesurfer) against a manually corrected approach, also involving Freesurfer. Additionally, we tested whether the relationship between volume and SA symptom severity would differ across volumetric techniques. We pooled participants ( n = 76) from archival studies. SA severity was assessed with the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale; scores ranged from non-clinical to clinical levels. Freesurfer produced significantly larger amygdalar volumes for participants with poor image quality. Even after excluding such participants, paired sample t -tests showed Freesurfer's boundaries produced significantly larger amygdalar volumes than manually corrected ones, bilaterally. Yet, intra-class correlation coefficients between the two methods were high, which suggests that Freesurfer's over-estimation of amygdala volume was systemic. Regardless of segmentation technique, volumes were not associated with SA symptom severity. Potentially, amygdala sub-regions may yield clearer patterns regarding SA symptoms. Further, our study underscores the importance of image quality for segmentation of the amygdala, and image quality may be particularly valuable when examining anatomical data for subtle inter-individual differences. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Psychiatry research. Volume 295(2020)
- Journal:
- Psychiatry research
- Issue:
- Volume 295(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 295, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 295
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0295-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01-30
- Subjects:
- Structural neuroimaging -- Freesurfer -- Manual segmentation -- Automated segmentation -- Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) -- Brain structure -- Volumetrics
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Brain -- Imaging -- Periodicals
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals
Psychiatrie -- Périodiques
Cerveau -- Imagerie pour le diagnostic -- Périodiques
616.890754 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09254927 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09254927 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/09254927 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2019.111006 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0925-4927
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6946.263705
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18023.xml