Analysis and improvement of dynamic heat exchanger models for nominal and start-up operation. (15th February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vaupel, Yannic; Huster, Wolfgang R.; Holtorf, Flemming; Mhamdi, Adel; Mitsos, Alexander
• Is Part Of: Energy. Volume 169(2019)
• Page Start: 1191
• Page End: 1201
• Publication Date: 2019-02-15
• Subjects: Heat exchanger -- Dynamic modeling -- Moving boundary -- Finite volume -- Start-up -- Switching model; Power resources -- Periodicals; Power (Mechanics) -- Periodicals; Energy consumption -- Periodicals; 333.7905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.048
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-5442

Abstract

Abstract: For control-oriented modeling of heat exchangers, the two predominant model types are the moving boundary (MB) approach and the finite volume (FV) method. In this contribution, we assess both approaches. As a case study, we present an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for waste heat recovery (WHR), for which experimental data is available. For simulation of nominal operation, we observe that the MB approach requires less CPU time than the FV method, even for a low number of cells, which is in agreement with literature. In the start-up case, where only subcooled liquid is present, analysis of the MB model reveals that the model can exhibit an unphysical inverse response in outlet enthalpy due to its averaging assumption. This problem can be circumvented via the use of a hybrid MB-FV model or an adjusted averaging assumption. A simulation study based on experimental data shows that both proposed solution approaches can be successfully employed. Highlights: Moving Boundary and Finite Volume approach for modeling heat exchangers are compared. The effect of the number of volumes for the Finite Volume model is assessed. Issues of the Moving Boundary model during start-up in power cycles are identified. The enthalpy averaging assumption of Moving Boundary model leads to inverse response. Two solutions are proposed and tested in simulations using experimental data.