Diagnostic capability of ultrasound in peritoneal catheter malfunction compared to videolaparoscopy. Issue 6 (November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zeiler, Matthias; Federico, Antonio; Lentini, Paolo; Dell'Aquila, Roberto; Santarelli, Stefano; Granata, Antonio
• Is Part Of: Peritoneal dialysis international. Volume 41:Issue 6(2021)
• Page Start: 564
• Page End: 568
• Publication Date: 2021-11
• Subjects: Agreement -- bedside -- diagnosis -- malfunction -- peritoneal dialysis -- surgery -- ultrasound scan -- videolaparoscopy; Peritoneal dialysis -- Periodicals; Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis -- Periodicals; 617.461059
• DOI: 10.1177/0896860821993946
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0896-8608

Abstract

Background: The approach to peritoneal catheter malfunction consists usually in a diagnostic and therapeutic sequence of laxative prescription, abdominal radiography, brushing of the catheter, guide-wire manipulation or fluoroscopy and in the end of a videolaparoscopy (VLS) rescue intervention. Ultrasound (US) is able to find out major causes of peritoneal catheter malfunction, however without a clearly defined diagnostic value. The aim of the study was to validate the diagnostic capability of US in catheter malfunction compared to the diagnostic reference of VLS. Methods: US scans of the subcutaneous and intraperitoneal segment of the catheter were performed prior to a VLS intervention in 40 adult patients presenting persistent catheter malfunction within a prospective multicentre study. Laxative prescription and brushing of the catheter lumen were undertaken prior to US scan. US diagnosis was compared to the corresponding at VLS, kappa coefficient calculated and the causes of mismatch analysed. Results: In US, causes of persistent malfunction were catheter dislocation combined with omental wrapping in 21 cases, omental wrapping without dislocation in 11 cases, dislocation only in 4 cases, adherences to non-omental structures in 3 cases and entrapment in the lateral inguinal fossa in 1 case. The US diagnosis corresponded to the respective at VLS in 36 of 40 cases, resulting in a kappa coefficient of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.78–1.00). The discrepancies were due to improper visualization of the catheter between omentum and intestinal loops, resulting in an erroneous US diagnosis of omental wrapping. Conclusions: This study suggests that US might have a pivotal role in the diagnostic approach to peritoneal catheter dysfunction.