Six-minute walk distance after coronary artery bypass grafting compared with medical therapy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Issue 1 (20th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stewart, Ralph A H; Szalewska, Dominika; Stebbins, Amanda; Al-Khalidi, Hussein R; Cleland, John G H; Rynkiewicz, Andrzej; Drazner, Mark H; White, Harvey D; Mark, Daniel B; Roy, Ambuj; Kosevic, Dragana; Rajda, Miroslaw; Jasinski, Marek; Leng, Chua Yeow; Tungsubutra, Wiwun; Desvigne-Nickens, Patrice; Velazquez, Eric J; Petrie, Mark C
• Is Part Of: Open heart. Volume 5:Issue 1(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-02-20
• Subjects: coronary artery bypass grafting -- ischemic cardiomyopathy -- exercise capacity -- six-minute walk distance -- clinical trial; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Patients -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000752
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2398-595X

Abstract

Abstract : Background: In patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction, coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) may decrease mortality, but it is not known whether CABG improves functional capacity. Objective: To determine whether CABG compared with medical therapy alone (MED) increases 6 min walk distance in patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease amenable to revascularisation. Methods: The Surgical Treatment in Ischemic Heart disease trial randomised 1212 patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction to CABG or MED. A 6 min walk distance test was performed both at baseline and at least one follow-up assessment at 4, 12, 24 and/or 36 months in 409 patients randomised to CABG and 466 to MED. Change in 6 min walk distance between baseline and follow-up were compared by treatment allocation. Results: 6 min walk distance at baseline for CABG was mean 340±117 m and for MED 339±118 m. Change in walk distance from baseline was similar for CABG and MED groups at 4 months (mean +38 vs +28 m), 12 months (+47 vs +36 m), 24 months (+31 vs +34 m) and 36 months (−7 vs +7 m), P>0.10 for all. Change in walk distance between CABG and MED groups over all assessments was also similar after adjusting for covariates and imputation for missing values (+8 m, 95% CI −7 to 23 m, P=0.29). Results were consistent for subgroups defined by angina, New York Heart Association class ≥3, left ventricular ejection fraction, baseline walk distance and geographic region. Conclusion: In patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction CABG compared with MED alone is known to reduce mortality but is unlikely to result in a clinically significant improvement in functional capacity. Trial registration number: NCT00023595 .