Effect of Chronic β-Blockade on the Utility of an Epinephrine-Containing Test Dose to Detect Intravascular Injection in Nonsedated Patients. Issue 5 (1st September 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pong, Ryan P.; Bernards, Christopher M.; Hejtmanek, Michael R.; Slee, April E.; Batra, Manbir S.
• Is Part Of: Regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Volume 38:Issue 5(2013)
• Page Start: 403
• Page End: 408
• Publication Date: 2013-09-01
• Subjects: Conduction anesthesia -- Periodicals; Pain medicine -- Periodicals; 617.964
• DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31829bb9fa
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1098-7339

Abstract

Abstract : Background and Objectives: A test dose containing epinephrine is routinely used during epidural blockade to detect accidental intravenous needle or catheter placement before the administration of local anesthetics to avert local anesthetic systemic toxicity. β-Blocker therapy may interfere with the expected hemodynamic response from an intravascular injection. This study describes a cohort of 24 patients and their response to an epinephrine test dose (ie, if expected increased heart rates during test-dose administration are valid in this population.) Methods: Twenty-four nonsedated, chronically β-blocked patients were enrolled in a prospective, order-randomized, crossover, double-blind study with injections of both placebo and a 15-μg epinephrine test dose in each individual. After injection into a peripheral vein, we observed blood pressure and pulse rate for 5 minutes, injected the other remaining solution (placebo or epinephrine), and observed hemodynamic parameters in the same fashion. Results: Epinephrine raised the heart rate 17.8 beats per minute (bpm) (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.5–20.1) versus placebo 2.0 bpm (95% CI, − 0.3–4.3 P < 0.001) and the systolic blood pressure 23 mm Hg (95% CI, 17.2–28.9) versus placebo 4.4 (95% CI, − 1.5–10.3); P < 0.001 in our chronically β-blocked population. A threshold increase of 20 bpm yielded a sensitivity of 37.5% (95% CI, 18.8%–59.4%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 85.8%–100%). Revising a threshold to include a change of 10 bpm or increase in systolic blood pressure of 15 mm Hg or greater yielded 100% (95% CI, 85.8%–100%) sensitivity and 87.5% (95% CI, 67.6%–97.3%) specificity. Conclusions: Epinephrine test-dose administration in nonsedated, chronically β-blocked patients cannot distinguish intravenous injection at the classic threshold increase of 20 bpm. The response in individuals is varied, and thresholds for a positive test need revising for this population of patients on therapeutic β-blockers.