A procedure to develop a backbone ground-motion model: A case study for its implementation. Issue 4 (November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Akkar, Sinan; Kale, Özkan; Sandıkkaya, M Abdullah; Yenier, Emrah
• Is Part Of: Earthquake spectra. Volume 37:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: 2523
• Page End: 2544
• Publication Date: 2021-11
• Subjects: Backbone ground motion modeling -- probabilistic seismic hazard assessment -- epistemic uncertainty in ground-motion modeling -- ground-motion logic tree -- ground-motion model testing and ranking; Earthquake engineering -- Periodicals; Earthquake engineering; Periodicals; 624.1762
• DOI: 10.1177/87552930211014541
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 8755-2930

Abstract

The backbone modeling in ground-motion characterization (GMC) is a useful methodology to describe the epistemic uncertainty in median ground-motion predictions. The approach uses a backbone ground-motion model (GMM) and populates the GMC logic tree with the scaled and/or adjusted versions of the backbone GMM to capture the epistemic uncertainty in median ground motions. The scaling and/or adjustment should represent the specific features and uncertainties involved in source, path, and site effects at the target site. The identification of the backbone model requires different considerations specific to the nature of the ground-motion hazard problem. In this article, we present a scaled backbone modeling approach that considers the magnitude- and distance-scaling predictors as well as their correlation to address the epistemic uncertainty in median ground-motion predictions. This approach results in a trivariate normal distribution to fully define a range of epistemic uncertainty in a model sample space. The simultaneous consideration of magnitude and distance scaling while defining the epistemic uncertainty and the methodology followed for the simplified representation of trivariate normal distribution in ground-motion logic tree are the two important features in our procedure. We first present the proposed approach that is followed by a case study for Central and Eastern North America (CENA) stable continental region. The case study discusses the underlying assumptions and limitations of the proposed approach.