A randomised, double-blind trial comparing budesonide formulations and dosages for short-term treatment of eosinophilic oesophagitis. Issue 3 (19th March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A randomised, double-blind trial comparing budesonide formulations and dosages for short-term treatment of eosinophilic oesophagitis. Issue 3 (19th March 2015)
- Main Title:
- A randomised, double-blind trial comparing budesonide formulations and dosages for short-term treatment of eosinophilic oesophagitis
- Authors:
- Miehlke, Stephan
Hruz, Petr
Vieth, Michael
Bussmann, Christian
von Arnim, Ulrike
Bajbouj, Monther
Schlag, Christoph
Madisch, Ahmed
Fibbe, Christiane
Wittenburg, Henning
Allescher, Hans Dieter
Reinshagen, Max
Schubert, Stefan
Tack, Jan
Müller, Michaela
Krummenerl, Patrick
Arts, Joris
Mueller, Ralph
Dilger, Karin
Greinwald, Roland
Straumann, Alex - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of two different budesonide formulations (effervescent tablet for orodispersible use (BET) and viscous suspension (BVS)) with different daily dosages for short-term treatment of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE). Design: Adults with active EoE (n=76) randomly received 14 days' treatment with either BET 2×1 mg/day (BET1, n=19) or BET 2×2 mg/day (BET2, n=19), or BVS 2×5 mL (0.4 mg/mL)/day (BVS, n=19) or placebo (n=19) in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion, with a 2-week follow-up. Primary end point was histological remission (mean of <16 eosinophils/mm 2 hpf). Secondary end points included endoscopy score, dysphagia score, drug safety and patient's preference for drug formulation. Results: Histological remission occurred in 100%, 94.7% and 94.7% of budesonide (BET1, BET2, BVS, respectively) and in 0% of placebo recipients (p<0.0001). The improvement in total endoscopic intensity score was significantly higher in the three budesonide groups compared with placebo. Dysphagia improved in all groups at the end of treatment; however, improvement of dysphagia persisted only in those treated with BET1 (p=0.0196 vs placebo). There were no serious adverse events. Local fungal infection (stained fungi) occurred in two patients of each budesonide group (10.5%). The effervescent tablet was preferred by 80% of patients. Conclusions: BET or BVS was highly effective and safe for short-term treatment of EoE. The 1 mg (twice daily)Abstract : Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of two different budesonide formulations (effervescent tablet for orodispersible use (BET) and viscous suspension (BVS)) with different daily dosages for short-term treatment of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE). Design: Adults with active EoE (n=76) randomly received 14 days' treatment with either BET 2×1 mg/day (BET1, n=19) or BET 2×2 mg/day (BET2, n=19), or BVS 2×5 mL (0.4 mg/mL)/day (BVS, n=19) or placebo (n=19) in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion, with a 2-week follow-up. Primary end point was histological remission (mean of <16 eosinophils/mm 2 hpf). Secondary end points included endoscopy score, dysphagia score, drug safety and patient's preference for drug formulation. Results: Histological remission occurred in 100%, 94.7% and 94.7% of budesonide (BET1, BET2, BVS, respectively) and in 0% of placebo recipients (p<0.0001). The improvement in total endoscopic intensity score was significantly higher in the three budesonide groups compared with placebo. Dysphagia improved in all groups at the end of treatment; however, improvement of dysphagia persisted only in those treated with BET1 (p=0.0196 vs placebo). There were no serious adverse events. Local fungal infection (stained fungi) occurred in two patients of each budesonide group (10.5%). The effervescent tablet was preferred by 80% of patients. Conclusions: BET or BVS was highly effective and safe for short-term treatment of EoE. The 1 mg (twice daily) dosage was equally effective as the 2 mg twice daily dosage. The majority of patients preferred the effervescent tablet formulation. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02280616; EudraCT number, 2009-016692-29. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Gut. Volume 65:Issue 3(2016)
- Journal:
- Gut
- Issue:
- Volume 65:Issue 3(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 65, Issue 3 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 65
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0065-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 390
- Page End:
- 399
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03-19
- Subjects:
- OESOPHAGITIS -- DYSPHAGIA
Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://gut.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308815 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0017-5749
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17985.xml