Agalsidase alfa versus agalsidase beta for the treatment of Fabry disease: an international cohort study. Issue 5 (7th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Arends, Maarten; Biegstraaten, Marieke; Wanner, Christoph; Sirrs, Sandra; Mehta, Atul; Elliott, Perry M; Oder, Daniel; Watkinson, Oliver T; Bichet, Daniel G; Khan, Aneal; Iwanochko, Mark; Vaz, Frédéric M; van Kuilenburg, André B P; West, Michael L; Hughes, Derralynn A; Hollak, Carla E M
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical genetics. Volume 55:Issue 5(2018)
• Page Start: 351
• Page End: 358
• Publication Date: 2018-02-07
• Subjects: fabry disease -- enzyme replacement therapy -- ert -- agalsidase alfa -- agalsidase beta; Medical genetics -- Periodicals; 616.042
• DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104863
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1468-6244

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Two recombinant enzymes (agalsidase alfa 0.2 mg/kg/every other week and agalsidase beta 1.0 mg/kg/every other week) have been registered for the treatment of Fabry disease (FD), at equal high costs. An independent international initiative compared clinical and biochemical outcomes of the two enzymes. Methods: In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, clinical event rate, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), antibody formation and globotriaosylsphingosine (lysoGb3) levels were compared between patients with FD treated with agalsidase alfa and beta at their registered dose after correction for phenotype and sex. Results: 387 patients (192 women) were included, 248 patients received agalsidase alfa. Mean age at start of enzyme replacement therapy was 46 (±15) years. Propensity score matched analysis revealed a similar event rate for both enzymes (HR 0.96, P=0.87). The decrease in plasma lysoGb3 was more robust following treatment with agalsidase beta, specifically in men with classical FD (β: −18 nmol/L, P<0.001), persisting in the presence of antibodies. The risk to develop antibodies was higher for patients treated with agalsidase beta (OR 2.8, P=0.04). LVMI decreased in a higher proportion following the first year of agalsidase beta treatment (OR 2.27, P=0.03), while eGFR slopes were similar. Conclusions: Treatment with agalsidase beta at higher dose compared with agalsidase alfa does not result in a difference in clinical events, which occurred especially in those with more advanced disease. A greater biochemical response, also in the presence of antibodies, and better reduction in left ventricular mass was observed with agalsidase beta.