060 Association of brain volume loss and neda outcomes in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis in the opera i and opera ii studies (ENCORE). Issue 6 (24th May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Traboulsee, Anthony; Arnold, Douglas; Klawiter, Eric C; Havrdova, Eva; Fiore, Damian; Zheng, Ray; Julian, Laura; Giovannoni, Gavin
• Is Part Of: Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry. Volume 89:Issue 6(2018)
• Page Start: A25
• Page End: A25
• Publication Date: 2018-05-24
• Subjects: Neurology -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-ANZAN.59
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3050

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Brain volume loss (BVL) occurs in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, reflecting irreversible tissue damage. No evidence of disease activity (NEDA), a composite measure assessing absence of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) disease activity has emerged as important treatment goal in MS and may be associated with preservation of brain tissue and BVL prevention. Methods: Patients in OPERA-I/II (NCT01247324 /NCT01412333) received 600 mg ocrelizumab (intravenous) very 24 weeks or 44 µg subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a) 3x-weekly for 96 weeks. Brain MRI assessments were completed at baseline and 24/48/96 Weeks. Brain volume normalised for head size was measured using SIENAX software. Percent change in whole brain volume (WBV) was determined using SIENA software, changes in cortical grey (GMV) and white (WMV) matter volumes were measured using validated, locally developed Jacobian integrator atrophy software. NEDA was defined as absence of relapses, 12-week confirmed disability progression, T1 Gd–enhancing lesions and new and/or enlarging T2-lesions. Changes from baseline in brain volume were examined in NEDA patients and those with evidence of disease activity (EDA), using the mixed-effects model for repeated measures method. Results: The analysis included 1520 patients (ocrelizumab-761; IFNβ-1a-759). Over 96 weeks, 569 (37%) patients [ocrelizumab-363 (48%); IFNβ-1a-206(27%); p<0.001] had NEDA. Compared with EDA patients, NEDA patients had significantly less WBV loss from baseline (30%-reduction; p<0.001). In the NEDA group, ocrelizumab patients had significantly less WBV loss (32%-reduction; p<0.001), WMV loss (34%-reduction; p=0.044) and GMV loss (30%-reduction; p<0.001) from baseline than IFNβ-1a patients. In the EDA group, ocrelizumab patients had significantly less WBV loss (11%-reduction; p=0.047) and GMV loss (21%-reduction; p<0.001) but not WMV loss (1.03%-increase; p=0.90) from baseline than IFNβ-1a patients. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of NEDA as treatment goal with respect to brain tissue preservation regardless of treatment choice. Ocrelizumab may confer additional benefits in NEDA patients NEDA beyond what is observed with IFNβ-1a.