Comparison between ORC and CO2 power systems for the exploitation of low-medium temperature heat sources. (15th October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Astolfi, Marco; Alfani, Dario; Lasala, Silvia; Macchi, Ennio
• Is Part Of: Energy. Volume 161(2018)
• Page Start: 1250
• Page End: 1261
• Publication Date: 2018-10-15
• Subjects: ORC -- CO2 -- Carbon dioxide -- Waste heat recovery -- Optimization -- Renewable energy; Power resources -- Periodicals; Power (Mechanics) -- Periodicals; Energy consumption -- Periodicals; 333.7905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.099
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-5442

Abstract

Abstract: Low-medium temperature heat sources in the range 5–50 MWth are made available by many industrial fields but they may also be of interest for biomass, geothermal and solar energy applications. ORC has been proposed in the last 20 years as a reliable solution for the exploitation of these energy sources since the alternative represented by steam cycles leads to an inefficient conversion of such small available thermal powers. However, the use of organic fluids involves a number of safety and environmental issues, either related to fluid flammability (for hydrocarbons) or to their high Global Warming Potential (for halogenated fluids), and of limitations to the achievable cycle maximum temperature, due to fluids thermal decomposition. To overcome these limitations, in recent years CO2 -based transcritical and supercritical cycles have been proposed as a viable option for this kind of applications. The present work aims to present a comparison between four CO2 cycle configurations and four ORC layouts using a working fluid selected from 47 candidates. The final result is a set of performance maps that allow for an easy selection of the best solution for applications exploiting low-medium temperature heat sources. Highlights: CO2 and ORC cycles are optimized for different low-medium temperature energy sources. Both ambient air and water are considered as cooling medium. Four CO2 layouts and four ORC configurations with 47 fluid candidates are considered. CO2 Cascade cycles are the most efficient option for high cooling grade heat sources. Selections maps easily allow identifying the best solution for different applications.