Can measuring hippocampal atrophy with a fully automatic method be substantially less noisy than manual segmentation over both 1 and 3 years?. (30th October 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Can measuring hippocampal atrophy with a fully automatic method be substantially less noisy than manual segmentation over both 1 and 3 years?. (30th October 2018)
- Main Title:
- Can measuring hippocampal atrophy with a fully automatic method be substantially less noisy than manual segmentation over both 1 and 3 years?
- Authors:
- Cover, Keith S.
van Schijndel, Ronald A.
Bosco, Paolo
Damangir, Soheil
Redolfi, Alberto - Abstract:
- Highlights: Robust assessment of segmentation noise of atrophy measuring methods in Alzheimer's. The noise of all methods violated the Gaussianity assumption of common statistics. Using robust statistics FreeSurfer 5.3.0 had the same noise as manual segmentation. MAPS-HBSI and FreeSurfer 6.0.0 were substantially less noisy than manual. MAPS-HBSI and FreeSurfer 6.0.0 required less than two thirds of the subjects of manual. Abstract: To quantify the "segmentation noise" of several widely used fully automatic methods for measuring longitudinal hippocampal atrophy in Alzheimer's disease and compare the results to the segmentation noise of manual segmentation over both 1 and 3 years. The segmentation noise of 5 longitudinal hippocampal atrophy measurement methods was quantified, including checking its Gaussianity, using 264 subjects from the ADNI1 back-to-back (BTB) data set over both 1 year and 3 year intervals. The segmentation methods were FreeSurfer 5.3.0 both cross sectional and longitudinal, FreeSurfer 6.0.0 longitudinal, MAPS-HBSI and FSL/FIRST 5.0.8. The BTB manual segmentation of 75 ADNI subjects from a previous study provided the manual distributions for comparison. All methods, including the manual segmentation, violated the Gaussianity assumption. Two methods, FreeSurfer 6.0.0 and MAPS-HBSI, had a segmentation noise substantially less than a surrogate for manual segmentation. FreeSurfer 5.3.0 longitudinal was confirmed as a surrogate for manual segmentation. TheHighlights: Robust assessment of segmentation noise of atrophy measuring methods in Alzheimer's. The noise of all methods violated the Gaussianity assumption of common statistics. Using robust statistics FreeSurfer 5.3.0 had the same noise as manual segmentation. MAPS-HBSI and FreeSurfer 6.0.0 were substantially less noisy than manual. MAPS-HBSI and FreeSurfer 6.0.0 required less than two thirds of the subjects of manual. Abstract: To quantify the "segmentation noise" of several widely used fully automatic methods for measuring longitudinal hippocampal atrophy in Alzheimer's disease and compare the results to the segmentation noise of manual segmentation over both 1 and 3 years. The segmentation noise of 5 longitudinal hippocampal atrophy measurement methods was quantified, including checking its Gaussianity, using 264 subjects from the ADNI1 back-to-back (BTB) data set over both 1 year and 3 year intervals. The segmentation methods were FreeSurfer 5.3.0 both cross sectional and longitudinal, FreeSurfer 6.0.0 longitudinal, MAPS-HBSI and FSL/FIRST 5.0.8. The BTB manual segmentation of 75 ADNI subjects from a previous study provided the manual distributions for comparison. All methods, including the manual segmentation, violated the Gaussianity assumption. Two methods, FreeSurfer 6.0.0 and MAPS-HBSI, had a segmentation noise substantially less than a surrogate for manual segmentation. FreeSurfer 5.3.0 longitudinal was confirmed as a surrogate for manual segmentation. The violation of the Gaussian assumption by the segmentation methods assessed, including manual, suggests results of previous studies that assumed Gaussian statistics without confirmation may need review. Fully automatic FreeSurfer 6.0.0 and MAPS-HBSI both have lower segmentation noise than manual requiring less than two thirds of the subjects to detect the same treatment effect. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Psychiatry research. Volume 280(2018)
- Journal:
- Psychiatry research
- Issue:
- Volume 280(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 280, Issue 2018 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 280
- Issue:
- 2018
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0280-2018-0000
- Page Start:
- 39
- Page End:
- 47
- Publication Date:
- 2018-10-30
- Subjects:
- Hippocampus -- Atrophy -- Manual segmentation -- Automatic segmentation -- Magnetic resonance imaging -- Alzheimer's disease -- Binomial
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Brain -- Imaging -- Periodicals
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals
Psychiatrie -- Périodiques
Cerveau -- Imagerie pour le diagnostic -- Périodiques
616.890754 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09254927 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09254927 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/09254927 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.06.011 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0925-4927
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6946.263705
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17946.xml