Reproducibility and replicability of rodent phenotyping in preclinical studies. (April 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Reproducibility and replicability of rodent phenotyping in preclinical studies. (April 2018)
- Main Title:
- Reproducibility and replicability of rodent phenotyping in preclinical studies
- Authors:
- Kafkafi, Neri
Agassi, Joseph
Chesler, Elissa J.
Crabbe, John C.
Crusio, Wim E.
Eilam, David
Gerlai, Robert
Golani, Ilan
Gomez-Marin, Alex
Heller, Ruth
Iraqi, Fuad
Jaljuli, Iman
Karp, Natasha A.
Morgan, Hugh
Nicholson, George
Pfaff, Donald W.
Richter, S. Helene
Stark, Philip B.
Stiedl, Oliver
Stodden, Victoria
Tarantino, Lisa M.
Tucci, Valter
Valdar, William
Williams, Robert W.
Würbel, Hanno
Benjamini, Yoav - Abstract:
- Highlights: Many published scientific discoveries fail to replicate. The field of mouse behavioral phenotyping was one of the first to raise this concern. Replicability should be addressed at the statistical and methodological levels. The issue does not question the validity of model organisms as a whole. Community efforts and data sharing help in promoting effective solutions. Abstract: The scientific community is increasingly concerned with the proportion of published "discoveries" that are not replicated in subsequent studies. The field of rodent behavioral phenotyping was one of the first to raise this concern, and to relate it to other methodological issues: the complex interaction between genotype and environment; the definitions of behavioral constructs; and the use of laboratory mice and rats as model species for investigating human health and disease mechanisms. In January 2015, researchers from various disciplines gathered at Tel Aviv University to discuss these issues. The general consensus was that the issue is prevalent and of concern, and should be addressed at the statistical, methodological and policy levels, but is not so severe as to call into question the validity and the usefulness of model organisms as a whole. Well-organized community efforts, coupled with improved data and metadata sharing, have a key role in identifying specific problems and promoting effective solutions. Replicability is closely related to validity, may affect generalizability andHighlights: Many published scientific discoveries fail to replicate. The field of mouse behavioral phenotyping was one of the first to raise this concern. Replicability should be addressed at the statistical and methodological levels. The issue does not question the validity of model organisms as a whole. Community efforts and data sharing help in promoting effective solutions. Abstract: The scientific community is increasingly concerned with the proportion of published "discoveries" that are not replicated in subsequent studies. The field of rodent behavioral phenotyping was one of the first to raise this concern, and to relate it to other methodological issues: the complex interaction between genotype and environment; the definitions of behavioral constructs; and the use of laboratory mice and rats as model species for investigating human health and disease mechanisms. In January 2015, researchers from various disciplines gathered at Tel Aviv University to discuss these issues. The general consensus was that the issue is prevalent and of concern, and should be addressed at the statistical, methodological and policy levels, but is not so severe as to call into question the validity and the usefulness of model organisms as a whole. Well-organized community efforts, coupled with improved data and metadata sharing, have a key role in identifying specific problems and promoting effective solutions. Replicability is closely related to validity, may affect generalizability and translation of findings, and has important ethical implications. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. Volume 87(2018)
- Journal:
- Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
- Issue:
- Volume 87(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 87, Issue 2018 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 87
- Issue:
- 2018
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0087-2018-0000
- Page Start:
- 218
- Page End:
- 232
- Publication Date:
- 2018-04
- Subjects:
- Reproducibility -- Replicability -- GxE interaction -- Validity -- Data sharing -- False discoveries -- Heterogenization
Psychophysiology -- Periodicals
Human behavior -- Periodicals
Animal behavior -- Periodicals
Neurology -- Periodicals
Behavior -- Periodicals
Ethology -- Periodicals
Neurology -- Periodicals
Psychophysiologie -- Périodiques
Comportement humain -- Périodiques
Animaux -- Mœurs et comportement -- Périodiques
Neurologie -- Périodiques
Animal behavior
Human behavior
Neurology
Psychophysiology
Periodicals
Electronic journals
573.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01497634 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.01.003 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0149-7634
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.561000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17943.xml