Standard magnetic resonance imaging is inadequate for patients with refractory focal epilepsy. Issue 6 (1st December 2002)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: von Oertzen, J; Urbach, H; Jungbluth, S; Kurthen, M; Reuber, M; Fernández, G; Elger, C E
• Is Part Of: Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry. Volume 73:Issue 6(2002)
• Page Start: 643
• Page End: 647
• Publication Date: 2002-12-01
• Subjects: epilepsy -- neurosurgery -- magnetic resonance imaging; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging -- HS, hippocampal sclerosis; Neurology -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.73.6.643
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3050

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Patients with intractable epilepsy may benefit from epilepsy surgery especially if they have a radiologically demonstrable cerebral lesion. Dedicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols as performed at epilepsy surgery centres can detect epileptogenic abnormalities with great sensitivity and specificity. However, many patients with epilepsy are investigated with standard MRI sequences by radiologist outside epilepsy centres ("non-experts"). This study was undertaken to compare standard MRI and epilepsy specific MRI findings in patients with focal epilepsy. Methods: Comparison of results of standard MRI reported by "non-expert" radiologists, standard MRI evaluated by epilepsy "expert" radiologists, and epilepsy specific MRI read by "expert" radiologists in 123 consecutive patients undergoing epilepsy surgery evaluation between 1996 and 1999. Validation of radiological findings by correlation with postoperative histological examination. Results: Sensitivity of "non-expert" reports of standard MRI reports for focal lesions was 39%, of "expert" reports of standard MRI 50%, and of epilepsy dedicated MRI 91%. Dedicated MRI showed focal lesions in 85% of patients with "non-lesional" standard MRI. The technical quality of standard MRI improved during the study period, but "non-expert" reporting did not. In particular, hippocampal sclerosis was missed in 86% of cases. Neuropathological diagnoses (n=90) were predicted correctly in 22% of "non-expert" standard MRI reports but by 89% of dedicated MRI reports. Conclusions: Standard MRI failed to detect 57% of focal epileptogenic lesions. Patients without MRI lesion are less likely to be considered candidates for epilepsy surgery. Patients with refractory epilepsy should be referred to an MRI unit with epileptological experience at an early point.