Effects of Fe(III)-fulvic acid on Cu removal via adsorption versus coprecipitation. (April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yang, Ren; Li, Zhongwu; Huang, Bin; Luo, Ninglin; Huang, Mei; Wen, Jiajun; Zhang, Qiu; Zhai, Xiuqing; Zeng, Guangming
• Is Part Of: Chemosphere. Volume 197(2018)
• Page Start: 291
• Page End: 298
• Publication Date: 2018-04
• Subjects: Ferrihydrite -- Copper -- Fulvic acid -- Adsorption -- Coprecipitation; Pollution -- Periodicals; Pollution -- Physiological effect -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; Atmospheric chemistry -- Periodicals; 551.511
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.042
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0045-6535

Abstract

Abstract: This study compared the sorption and extractability of Cu following adsorption (SOR) and coprecipitation(CPT). The effect of solution pH, Fe: organic carbon (OC) ratios and fulvic acid (FA) on the combined removal of Cu was investigated in the batch tests using Fe(III) precipitates as a sorbent. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images demonstrated that the coexisting FA reduced the particle size of ferrihydrites as expected. Generally, more Cu was eliminated in coprecipitation compared with adsorption and the dissolved Cu left in solutions decreased as the pH increased, most of dissolved Cu was trapped at pH 6 and above. Meanwhile, the inhibition or promotion of Cu removal really depended on the different Fe: OC ratios. The addition of FA led to a further decrease of Cu concentrations in CPT systems with Fe/OC ratio of 1:3, however, Cu removal was hindered in the presence of FA in SOR systems. In the case of extraction experiments, the addition of l -malic acid (MA), oxalic acid (OA) and citric acid (CA) resulted in lower extractability of coprecipitated Cu than adsorption samples. The gaps in extractions were seemed to be a consequence of tight Cu binding in CPT products, and the more feasible desorption of Cu from the surface of SOR samples. Based on the results of Cu adsorption and coprecipitation, coprecipitation of Cu with ferrihydrites was the more effective Cu sequestration mechanism in the removal of Cu. These results are helpful to understand the complicated interactions among Fe(III), FA and Cu (II) in the natural environment. Highlights: The ternary precipitates were formed and Cu(II) removal by adsorption and coprecipitation was compared. More Cu was removed as the pH increased in the ternary system. The additional FA remarkably increased Cu concentrations during SOR reactions. Extractability of Cu was generally lower from coprecipitates.