THU0165 Long-Term Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes Based on Clinical Disease Activity Index Responses with Tofacitinib at 6 Months. (15th July 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- THU0165 Long-Term Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes Based on Clinical Disease Activity Index Responses with Tofacitinib at 6 Months. (15th July 2016)
- Main Title:
- THU0165 Long-Term Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes Based on Clinical Disease Activity Index Responses with Tofacitinib at 6 Months
- Authors:
- Strand, V.
Kavanaugh, A.
Kivitz, A.
van der Heijde, D.
Kwok, K.
Akylbekova, E.
Soonasra, A.
Snyder, M.
Connell, C.
Bananis, E.
Smolen, J. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of RA. Objectives: This analysis assessed if patients achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission (REM) or low disease activity (LDA) at Month 6 had less radiographic progression and improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at Month 24 and compared results between tofacitinib and MTX. Methods: ORAL Start (NCT01039688 ) and ORAL Scan (NCT00847613 ) were Phase 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in MTX therapeutically naïve and MTX inadequate response (IR) patients with RA, respectively. In ORAL Start and Scan, patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) monotherapy vs MTX monotherapy or tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID + MTX vs placebo + MTX, respectively. This was an observed analysis of patients with radiographs at Months 6, 12 and 24, excluding placebo-treated patients in ORAL Scan. Patients were classified according to CDAI responses at Month 6: REM (CDAI ≤2.8); LDA (CDAI >2.8 to ≤10); or incomplete-responders (CDAI >10). Outcomes included the proportion of patients with no radiographic progression (change in modified Total Sharp Score [mTSS] ≤0) and/or HAQ-DI ≤0.5 (defined as normative) at Month 24, and mean changes from baseline in mTSS and HAQ-DI. Results: In ORAL Start, 250, 269 and 98 patients received tofacitinib 5 mg BID, tofacitinib 10 mg BID and MTX, respectively. In ORAL Scan, 193 and 201 patients received tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID, respectively. BaselineAbstract : Background: Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of RA. Objectives: This analysis assessed if patients achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission (REM) or low disease activity (LDA) at Month 6 had less radiographic progression and improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at Month 24 and compared results between tofacitinib and MTX. Methods: ORAL Start (NCT01039688 ) and ORAL Scan (NCT00847613 ) were Phase 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in MTX therapeutically naïve and MTX inadequate response (IR) patients with RA, respectively. In ORAL Start and Scan, patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) monotherapy vs MTX monotherapy or tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID + MTX vs placebo + MTX, respectively. This was an observed analysis of patients with radiographs at Months 6, 12 and 24, excluding placebo-treated patients in ORAL Scan. Patients were classified according to CDAI responses at Month 6: REM (CDAI ≤2.8); LDA (CDAI >2.8 to ≤10); or incomplete-responders (CDAI >10). Outcomes included the proportion of patients with no radiographic progression (change in modified Total Sharp Score [mTSS] ≤0) and/or HAQ-DI ≤0.5 (defined as normative) at Month 24, and mean changes from baseline in mTSS and HAQ-DI. Results: In ORAL Start, 250, 269 and 98 patients received tofacitinib 5 mg BID, tofacitinib 10 mg BID and MTX, respectively. In ORAL Scan, 193 and 201 patients received tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID, respectively. Baseline demographics were generally similar between subpopulations within each RCT; however, incomplete responders generally had higher baseline disease activity. In both ORAL Start and Scan, patients in REM or LDA with tofacitinib at Month 6 were more likely to be radiographic non-progressors and achieve normative HAQ-DI scores at Month 24 (Table ). Tofacitinib-treated patients in REM at Month 6 generally had better HAQ-DI scores at Month 24 than LDA patients. In ORAL Start at Month 6, a higher proportion of tofacitinib- than MTX-treated patients were in REM or LDA (Table ). CDAI incomplete responders receiving tofacitinib had improved HAQ-DI scores and less radiographic progression compared with MTX-treated counterparts. Overall, more tofacitinib-treated patients who achieved REM or LDA were non-progressors or achieved HAQ-DI scores ≤0.5 compared to those treated with MTX. Conclusions: More MTX-naïve or MTX-IR tofacitinib-treated patients achieving CDAI REM or LDA at Month 6 were radiographic non-progressors or achieved normative HAQ DI scores at Month 24, compared with CDAI incomplete responders. In ORAL Start, more tofacitinib-treated than MTX-treated MTX-naïve patients achieved CDAI REM or LDA at Month 6 with better PROs and radiographic outcomes at Month 24. Acknowledgement: Previously presented (Strand V et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015; 67 (S10): Abstr 1633) and reproduced with permission from Arthritis Rheumatol. This study was funded by Pfizer Inc. Editorial support was provided by S Johnson of Complete Medical Communications and funded by Pfizer Inc. Disclosure of Interest: V. Strand Grant/research support from: Pfizer Inc, Consultant for: Pfizer Inc, A. Kavanaugh Grant/research support from: Pfizer Inc, A. Kivitz Grant/research support from: Pfizer Inc, Consultant for: Pfizer Inc, Speakers bureau: Pfizer Inc, D. van der Heijde Consultant for: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Imaging Rheumatology, K. Kwok Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, E. Akylbekova Consultant for: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Quintiles Inc, A. Soonasra Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, M. Snyder Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, C. Connell Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, E. Bananis Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, J. Smolen Grant/research support from: Pfizer Inc, Consultant for: Pfizer Inc … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 75(2016)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 75(2016)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 75, Issue 2 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 75
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0075-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 243
- Page End:
- 243
- Publication Date:
- 2016-07-15
- Subjects:
- Rheumatism -- Periodicals
616.723005 - Journal URLs:
- http://ard.bmjjournals.com/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=149&action=archive ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/server3/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&D=ovft&PAGE=titles&SEARCH=annals+of+the+rheumatic+diseases.tj&NEWS=N ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.1264 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4967
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17926.xml