Changes in HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular outcomes after lipid modification therapy. Issue 10 (24th March 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ray, Kausik; Wainwright, Nick W J; Visser, Loes; Witteman, Jacqueline; Breteler, Monique; Ambegaonkar, Baishali; Hofman, Albert; Stricker, Bruno; Wareham, Nick; Khaw, Kay Tee; Sandhu, Manjinder
• Is Part Of: Heart. Volume 98:Issue 10(2012)
• Page Start: 780
• Page End: 785
• Publication Date: 2012-03-24
• Subjects: lipids -- lipoproteins -- HDL -- atherosclerosis -- myocardial infarction -- risk factors -- psychology/psychiatry; Heart -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301405
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1355-6037

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Lipid modification therapy (LMT) produces cardiovascular benefits principally through reductions in low density lipoprotein cholesterol. While recent evidence, using data from 454 participants in the Framingham Offspring Study, has suggested that increases in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) are also associated with a reduction in cardiovascular outcomes, independently of changes in low density lipoprotein cholesterol, replication of this finding is important. The authors therefore present further results using data from the EPIC-Norfolk (UK) and Rotterdam (The Netherlands) prospective cohort studies. Methods: A total of 1148 participants, 446 from the EPIC-Norfolk and 702 from the Rotterdam study, were assessed for lipids before and after starting LMT. Subsequent risk of cardiovascular events, ascertained through linkage with mortality records and hospital databases, was investigated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Random effects meta-analysis was used to combine results across studies. Results: Based on combined data from the EPIC-Norfolk and Rotterdam studies there was some evidence that change in HDL-C resulting from LMT was associated with reduced cardiovascular risk (HR per pooled SD (=0.34 mmol/l) increase=0.74, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.99, adjusted for age, sex and baseline HDL-C). However, this association was attenuated and was not (statistically) significant with further adjustments for non-HDL-C and for cigarette smoking history, prevalent diabetes, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, use of antihypertensive medication, previous myocardial infarction, prevalent angina and previous stroke (0.92, 0.701.20). Conclusions: Following adjustment for conventional non-lipid risk factors of cardiovascular disease, this study provides no evidence to support a significant benefit from increasing HDL-C independent of the effect of lowering non-HDL-C.