Measurement error in the assessment of radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials: the smallest detectable change (SDC) revisited. Issue 6 (20th April 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Navarro-Compán, V; van der Heijde, D; Ahmad, Harris A; Miller, Colin G; Wolterbeek, R; Landewé, R
• Is Part Of: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 73:Issue 6(2014)
• Page Start: 1067
• Page End: 1070
• Publication Date: 2013-04-20
• Subjects: Rheumatoid Arthritis -- Outcomes research -- Quality Indicators; Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202939
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-4967

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To evaluate if the mean smallest detectable change (SDC) of multiple time intervals using the Bland & Altman (B&A) levels of agreement (LoA) method is an appropriate surrogate for the generalisability analysis method for estimating the overall SDC of radiological progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) trials. Secondly, to compare the SDC based on 95% LoA with the SDC based on 80% LoA, and to investigate the association between SDC and baseline damage and progression. Methods: Fifteen datasets from randomised controlled trials in RA were scored by 13 experienced readers as pairs according to the modified Sharp/van der Heijde method. The SDC using the 95% and 80% LoA and the generalisability methods was calculated. Results: 21 295 radiographic time points from 7643 patients were included. The mean (range) SDC for the LoA and the generalisability methods was 3.1 (2.3–4.3) and 3.2 (2.3–4.6) units, respectively. The mean±SD difference between the two methods was −0.13±0.28. The mean SDC including all intervals (n=31) was 3.0±0.7 for 95% LoA and 2.0±0.4 for 80% LoA. No relationship was observed between baseline damage and the SDC, whereas the SDC increased with increasing radiological progression. Conclusions: The mean of the interval SDCs obtained by the simple LoA method is a valid surrogate for the SDC obtained by complex generalisability methods. The SDC depends on the level of radiographic progression rather than on the level of absolute damage. In addition, the use of an SDC based on 80% rather than on 95% LoA is proposed.