Investigation of effectiveness and pumping power of plate heat exchanger with rough surface. (16th January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Attalla, M.; Maghrabie, Hussein M.
• Is Part Of: Chemical engineering science. Volume 211(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-01-16
• Subjects: Plate heat exchanger -- Relative roughness -- Effectiveness -- Number of transfer units -- Pumping power -- Specific heat rate; Chemical engineering -- Periodicals; Génie chimique -- Périodiques; Chemical engineering; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 660
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.115277
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-2509

Abstract

Highlights: Fluid flow and thermal performances of PHE are investigated experimentally. The effectiveness and NTU of PHE are improved with increasing Rr . Pressure drop and pumping power are increased by increasing Rr . SHR is improved with increasing surface roughness particularly at low Reynolds number. Empirical correlations are proposed to predict SHR as a function of Rr and Re . Abstract: In the present paper, an experimental study of the effectiveness and pumping power of plate heat exchanger (PHE) with rough surface was performed. The experiments were developed for different values of relative roughness, Rr, of 2.6 * 10 −4 (smooth surface), 3.4 * 10 −4, 7.5 * 10 −4 and 9.8 * 10 −4 for Reynolds number, Re, varied from 500 to 5000. The average heat transfer rate, Q avg, hence the effectiveness of PHE, ε, and number of transfer units, NTU, as well as pressure drop, Δp, consequently pumping power, P, and specfic heat rate, SHR, were estimated. The results show that Q avg and NTU are enhanced with increasing Rr ; while, they are decreased with increasing Re . At Re = 5000, the effectiveness of PHE with relative roughness of 3.4 * 10 −4, 7.5 * 10 −4 and 9.8 * 10 −4 is greater than that of the smooth surface by 11.5%, 16.6% and 18.6%, respectively. Furthermore, Δp and P are increased by increasing Rr and Re . Moreover, at Re = 500, SHR is enhanced with increasing Rr and its improvements compared with the smooth surface are 39.5%, 23.4% and 6.9% for Rr of 3.4 * 10 −4, 7.5 * 10 −4 and 9.8 * 10 −4, respectively. In addition, empirical correlations are proposed to estimate SHR as a function of Rr and Re with a standard deviation of 5.1%.