Endoscopic versus histological characterisation of polyps during screening colonoscopy. Issue 3 (28th June 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schachschal, Guido; Mayr, Michael; Treszl, Andras; Balzer, Klaus; Wegscheider, Karl; Aschenbeck, Jens; Aminalai, Alireza; Drossel, Rolf; Schröder, Andreas; Scheel, Mathias; Bothe, Carl-Hermann; Bruhn, Jens-Peter; Burmeister, Wolfgang; Stange, Gabriela; Bähr, Christina; Kießlich, Ralf; Rösch, Thomas
• Is Part Of: Gut. Volume 63:Issue 3(2014)
• Page Start: 458
• Page End: 465
• Publication Date: 2013-06-28
• Subjects: Colorectal Adenomas -- Colonic Polyps -- Differentiation -- Screening; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304562
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-5749

Abstract

Abstract : Background: As screening colonoscopy becomes more widespread, the costs for histopathological assessment of resected polyps are rising correspondingly. Reference centres have published highly accurate results for endoscopic polyp classification. Therefore, it has been proposed that, for smaller polyps, the differential diagnosis that guides follow-up recommendations could be based on endoscopy alone. Objective: The aim was to prospectively assess whether the high accuracy for endoscopic polyp diagnosis as reported by reference centres can be reproduced in routine screening colonoscopy. Design: Ten experienced private practice endoscopists had initial training in pit patterns. Then they assessed all polyps detected during 1069 screening colonoscopies. Patients (46% men; mean age 63 years) were randomly assigned to colonoscopy with conventional or latest generation HDTV instruments. The main outcome measure was diagnostic accuracy of in vivo polyp assessment (adenomatous vs hyperplastic). Secondary outcome measures were differences between endoscopes and reliability of image-based follow-up recommendations; a blinded post hoc analysis of polyp photographs was also performed. Results: 675 polyps were assessed (461 adenomatous, 214 hyperplastic). Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of in vivo diagnoses were 76.6%, 78.1% and 73.4%; size of adenomas and endoscope withdrawal time significantly influenced accuracy. Image-based recommendations for post-polypectomy surveillance were correct in only 69.5% of cases. Post hoc analysis of polyp photographs did not improve accuracy. Conclusions: In everyday practice, endoscopic classification of polyp type is not accurate enough to abandon histopathological assessment and use of latest generation colonoscopes does not improve this. Image-based surveillance recommendations after polypectomy would consequently not meet guideline requirements. TrialRegNo: NCT01297712.