Prenatal detection of unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements by array CGH. Issue 4 (30th September 2005)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rickman, L; Fiegler, H; Shaw-Smith, C; Nash, R; Cirigliano, V; Voglino, G; Ng, B L; Scott, C; Whittaker, J; Adinolfi, M; Carter, N P; Bobrow, M
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical genetics. Volume 43:Issue 4(2006)
• Page Start: 353
• Page End: 361
• Publication Date: 2005-09-30
• Subjects: BAC, bacterial artificial chromosome -- CGH, comparative genomic hybridisation -- FISH, fluorescent in situ hybridisation -- PAC, plasmid artificial chromosome -- QF-PCR, quantitative fluorescent PCR; prenatal -- array CGH -- aneuploidy -- microdeletion; Medical genetics -- Periodicals; 616.042
• DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2005.037648
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1468-6244

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Karyotype analysis has been the standard method for prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis since the 1970s. Although highly reliable, the major limitation remains the requirement for cell culture, resulting in a delay of as much as 14 days to obtaining test results. Fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) and quantitative fluorescent PCR (QF-PCR) rapidly detect common chromosomal abnormalities but do not provide a genome wide screen for unexpected imbalances. Array comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) has the potential to combine the speed of DNA analysis with a large capacity to scan for genomic abnormalities. We have developed a genomic microarray of approximately 600 large insert clones designed to detect aneuploidy, known microdeletion syndromes, and large unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements. Methods: This array was tested alongside an array with an approximate resolution of 1 Mb in a blind study of 30 cultured prenatal and postnatal samples with microscopically confirmed unbalanced rearrangements. Results: At 1 Mb resolution, 22/30 rearrangements were identified, whereas 29/30 aberrations were detected using the custom designed array, owing to the inclusion of specifically chosen clones to give increased resolution at genomic loci clinically implicated in known microdeletion syndromes. Both arrays failed to identify a triploid karyotype. Thirty normal control samples produced no false positive results. Conclusions: Analysis of 30 uncultured prenatal samples showed that array CGH is capable of detecting aneuploidy in DNA isolated from as little as 1 ml of uncultured amniotic fluid; 29/30 samples were correctly diagnosed, the exception being another case of triploidy. These studies demonstrate the potential for array CGH to replace conventional cytogenetics in the great majority of prenatal diagnosis cases.