International migration and adverse birth outcomes: role of ethnicity, region of origin and destination. Issue 3 (19th August 2009)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Urquia, Marcelo Luis; Glazier, Richard Henry; Blondel, Beatrice; Zeitlin, Jennifer; Gissler, Mika; Macfarlane, Alison; Ng, Edward; Heaman, Maureen; Stray-Pedersen, Babill; Gagnon, Anita J
• Is Part Of: Journal of epidemiology and community health. Volume 64:Issue 3(2010)
• Page Start: 243
• Page End: 251
• Publication Date: 2009-08-19
• Subjects: ethnicity -- low birth weight -- meta-analysis ME -- migration and health -- multilevel modelling -- perinatal CG -- preterm birth; Public health -- Periodicals; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; 614.4
• DOI: 10.1136/jech.2008.083535
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0143-005X

Abstract

Abstract : Background: The literature on international migration and birth outcomes shows mixed results. This study examined whether low birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth differed between non-migrants and migrant subgroups, defined by race/ethnicity and world region of origin and destination. Methods: A systematic review and meta-regression analyses were conducted using three-level logistic models to account for the heterogeneity between studies and between subgroups within studies. Results: Twenty-four studies, involving more than 30 million singleton births, met the inclusion criteria. Compared with US-born black women, black migrant women were at lower odds of delivering LBW and preterm birth babies. Hispanic migrants also exhibited lower odds for these outcomes, but Asian and white migrants did not. Sub-Saharan African and Latin-American and Caribbean women were at higher odds of delivering LBW babies in Europe but not in the USA and south-central Asians were at higher odds in both continents, compared with the native-born populations. Conclusions: The association between migration and adverse birth outcomes varies by migrant subgroup and it is sensitive to the definition of the migrant and reference groups.