Optimizing endovascular stroke treatment: removing the microcatheter before clot retrieval with stent-retrievers increases aspiration flow. (15th April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nikoubashman, Omid; Alt, Jan Patrick; Nikoubashman, Arash; Büsen, Martin; Heringer, Sarah; Brockmann, Carolin; Brockmann, Marc-Alexander; Müller, Marguerite; Reich, Arno; Wiesmann, Martin
• Is Part Of: Journal of neurointerventional surgery. Volume 9:Number 5(2017)
• Page Start: 459
• Page End: 462
• Publication Date: 2016-04-15
• Subjects: Stroke -- Catheter -- Balloon -- Intervention -- Stent; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Cerebrovascular disease -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.48
• DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012319
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1759-8478

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Flow control during endovascular stroke treatment with stent-retrievers is crucial for successful revascularization. The standard technique recommended by stent-retriever manufacturers implies obstruction of the respective access catheter by the microcatheter, through which the stent-retriever is delivered. This, in turn, results in reduced aspiration during thrombectomy. In order to maximize aspiration, we fully retract the microcatheter out of the access catheter before thrombectomy—an approach we term the 'bare wire thrombectomy' (BWT) technique. We verified the improved throughput with systematic in vitro studies and assessed the clinical effectiveness and safety of this method. Methods: We compared aspiration flow of water through various access catheters (5–8 F) with a Rebar microcatheter (0.18 inch and 0.27 inch) and a Trevo stent-retriever using the standard technique and the BWT technique in vitro. We also retrospectively analyzed 302 retrieval maneuvers in 117 patients who received endovascular treatment with a stent-retriever between February 2010 and April 2015. Results: In the in vitro experiment, removal of the microcatheter in all tested settings resulted in significantly increased aspiration flow through the access catheter (p<0.001). This effect was particularly pronounced in access catheters with a diameter of ≤7 F. In the clinical study, the revascularization rate (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction ≥2b) was 91%. There were no complications associated with the BWT technique in 302 retrieval maneuvers. Conclusions: The BWT technique results in improved aspiration flow rates compared with the standard deployment technique. Our clinical data show that the BWT technique is effective and safe.