A classification framework for carbon tax revenue use. (9th August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Steenkamp, Lee-Ann
• Is Part Of: Climate policy. Volume 21:Number 7(2021)
• Page Start: 897
• Page End: 911
• Publication Date: 2021-08-09
• Subjects: carbon tax -- revenue use -- revenue recycling -- carbon pricing -- earmarking -- willingness-to-pay; 363.7
• DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2021.1946381
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1469-3062

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Carbon pricing could assist in the dual pursuit of mitigating global climate change and contributing to government coffers. The way in which a government allocates carbon tax revenues is a key factor in the public's acceptance of carbon pricing policy and ultimately in its enduring success. To that end, this article presents an innovative, simple classification framework of carbon tax revenue usage which has four modalities to cater for various policy design features. These are: a constrained approach as opposed to an unconstrained one; a revenue-neutral recycling approach as opposed to a revenue-raising one; an approach according to public preference; and a thematic approach. Thereafter, various attributes are examined to assist policymakers in selecting an appropriate modality. The classification framework will be useful for policymakers as a quick point of reference before embarking on more complex and in-depth policy deliberations. Key policy insights Carbon pricing is the most cost-effective regulatory approach for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and is recognized as a significant contributor to government revenue. Carbon tax revenue use can be classified into four overarching modalities to cater for various policy design attributes. There is no dominating revenue use option from an economic or political viewpoint, owing to trade-offs across various fiscal policy objectives. Carbon taxes are elements of broader tax reform and therefore revenue use options should be aligned with a jurisdiction's broader fiscal policy charter.