Is the South African Triage Scale valid for use in Afghanistan, Haiti and Sierra Leone?. Issue 2 (15th June 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Is the South African Triage Scale valid for use in Afghanistan, Haiti and Sierra Leone?. Issue 2 (15th June 2017)
- Main Title:
- Is the South African Triage Scale valid for use in Afghanistan, Haiti and Sierra Leone?
- Authors:
- Dalwai, Mohammed
Valles, Pola
Twomey, Michele
Nzomukunda, Yvonne
Jonjo, Prince
Sasikumar, Manoj
Nasim, Masood
Razaaq, Abdul
Gayraud, Olivia
Jecrois, Pierre Ronald
Wallis, Lee
Tayler-Smith, Katie - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To assess the validity of the South African Triage Scale (SATS) in four Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)-supported emergency departments (ED, two trauma-only sites, one mixed site (both medical and trauma cases) and one paediatric-only site) in Afghanistan, Haiti and Sierra Leone. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted between June 2013 and June 2014. Validity was assessed by comparing patients' SATS ratings with their final ED outcome (ie, hospital admission, death or discharge). Results: In the two trauma settings, the SATS demonstrated good validity: it accurately predicted an increase in the likelihood of mortality and hospitalisation across incremental acuity levels (p<0.001) and ED outcomes for 'green' and 'red' patients matched the predicted ED outcomes in 84%–99% of cases. In the mixed ED, the SATS was able to predict an incremental increase in hospitalisation (p<0.001) across both trauma and non-trauma cases. In the paediatric-only settings, SATS was able to predict an incremental increase in hospitalisation in the non-trauma cases only (p<0.001). However, 87% (non-trauma) and 94% (trauma) of 'red' patients in the mixed-medical setting were overtriaged and 76% (non-trauma) and 100% (trauma) of 'green' patients in the paediatric settings were undertriaged. Conclusion: The SATS is a valid tool for trauma-only settings in low-resource countries. Its use in mixed settings seems justified, but context-specific assessments would seemAbstract : Objective: To assess the validity of the South African Triage Scale (SATS) in four Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)-supported emergency departments (ED, two trauma-only sites, one mixed site (both medical and trauma cases) and one paediatric-only site) in Afghanistan, Haiti and Sierra Leone. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted between June 2013 and June 2014. Validity was assessed by comparing patients' SATS ratings with their final ED outcome (ie, hospital admission, death or discharge). Results: In the two trauma settings, the SATS demonstrated good validity: it accurately predicted an increase in the likelihood of mortality and hospitalisation across incremental acuity levels (p<0.001) and ED outcomes for 'green' and 'red' patients matched the predicted ED outcomes in 84%–99% of cases. In the mixed ED, the SATS was able to predict an incremental increase in hospitalisation (p<0.001) across both trauma and non-trauma cases. In the paediatric-only settings, SATS was able to predict an incremental increase in hospitalisation in the non-trauma cases only (p<0.001). However, 87% (non-trauma) and 94% (trauma) of 'red' patients in the mixed-medical setting were overtriaged and 76% (non-trauma) and 100% (trauma) of 'green' patients in the paediatric settings were undertriaged. Conclusion: The SATS is a valid tool for trauma-only settings in low-resource countries. Its use in mixed settings seems justified, but context-specific assessments would seem prudent. Finally, in paediatric settings with endemic malaria, adding haemoglobin level to the SATS discriminator list may help to improve the undertriage of patients with malaria. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ global health. Volume 2:Issue 2(2017)
- Journal:
- BMJ global health
- Issue:
- Volume 2:Issue 2(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2, Issue 2 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 2
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0002-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-06-15
- Subjects:
- Health Systems evaluation -- Trauma
World health -- Periodicals
362.105 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://gh.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000160 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2059-7908
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17885.xml