Mapping global policy discourse on antimicrobial resistance. Issue 2 (13th July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wernli, Didier; Jørgensen, Peter S; Morel, Chantal M; Carroll, Scott; Harbarth, Stephan; Levrat, Nicolas; Pittet, Didier
• Is Part Of: BMJ global health. Volume 2:Issue 2(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-07-13
• Subjects: health policies and all other topics -- infections -- diseases -- disorders -- injuries; World health -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000378
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2059-7908

Abstract

Abstract : The rising importance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to the global health agenda is associated with a growing number of parties voicing their concern about the issue. With more recommendations and policies appearing, understanding the policy process requires making sense of the views, values, interests and goals of each participant. Policy frame analysis provides a method to understand both the scientific view and the actions advocated by global health actors to tackle AMR. Here we review and refine policy frame analyses of AMR using a deductive approach. Among several policy frames previously defined in the field of global health, we identify 'AMR as healthcare', 'AMR as development', 'AMR as innovation' and 'AMR as security' as frequent frames used in dealing with AMR. In addition, we found that 'AMR as One Health' constitutes a recent framing of the topic that seeks to provide an integrated understanding between human and animal health. Each frame originates in distinct scientific fields, conceptualises the main causes of AMR and prioritises different interventions and measurements. Better understanding and integration of these frames into an overarching social and ecological framework will support policy progress in tackling AMR.