P144 Staff engagement survey pre- and 6-months post introduction of routine domestic abuse enquiry. (30th June 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- P144 Staff engagement survey pre- and 6-months post introduction of routine domestic abuse enquiry. (30th June 2016)
- Main Title:
- P144 Staff engagement survey pre- and 6-months post introduction of routine domestic abuse enquiry
- Authors:
- Sacks, Rachel
Ponnusamy, Nora
Mears, Alison - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background/introduction: In July 2015, routine domestic abuse (DA) enquiry was introduced in a busy, walk-in, inner-London, genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic. Guidelines, proforma and management pathway were devised. Tiered training was/is provided (basic level for all staff, in-depth for Sexual Health Information Protection team and DA champions). A separate audit demonstrated 91% of walk-in GUM patients were asked about DA, following routine enquiry introduction. Aim(s)/objectives: To assess staff engagement with routine DA enquiry. Methods: On-line survey disseminated to GUM healthcare professionals, two weeks prior to, and 6 months post-introduction of, routine DA enquiry. Results: 27 vs 20 staff completed the surveys. The majority were female [70 vs 90%]. Respondents were doctors [48.1% vs 42.1%], nurses [44.4% vs 57.9%] and healthcare assistants [7.4% vs 0%]. 3.7% vs 20% had worked in GUM < 1 year. 87.5% vs 89.5% had received training, 85.0% vs 100% of these respectively had rated this good-excellent. 4.8% vs 66.7% of respondents reported having managed patients disclosing DA at least once/week. 14.3% pre-introduction vs 0% post-introduction respondents had never managed a patient disclosing DA. Respondents reported feeling 'very confident' asking about DA [16.7% vs 63.2%] and managing disclosures [8.3% vs 26.3%]. 45.8% vs 63.2% thought 'Routine DA enquiry was a great idea…why hadn't we introduced earlier?' 8.3% pre-introduction respondents had someAbstract : Background/introduction: In July 2015, routine domestic abuse (DA) enquiry was introduced in a busy, walk-in, inner-London, genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic. Guidelines, proforma and management pathway were devised. Tiered training was/is provided (basic level for all staff, in-depth for Sexual Health Information Protection team and DA champions). A separate audit demonstrated 91% of walk-in GUM patients were asked about DA, following routine enquiry introduction. Aim(s)/objectives: To assess staff engagement with routine DA enquiry. Methods: On-line survey disseminated to GUM healthcare professionals, two weeks prior to, and 6 months post-introduction of, routine DA enquiry. Results: 27 vs 20 staff completed the surveys. The majority were female [70 vs 90%]. Respondents were doctors [48.1% vs 42.1%], nurses [44.4% vs 57.9%] and healthcare assistants [7.4% vs 0%]. 3.7% vs 20% had worked in GUM < 1 year. 87.5% vs 89.5% had received training, 85.0% vs 100% of these respectively had rated this good-excellent. 4.8% vs 66.7% of respondents reported having managed patients disclosing DA at least once/week. 14.3% pre-introduction vs 0% post-introduction respondents had never managed a patient disclosing DA. Respondents reported feeling 'very confident' asking about DA [16.7% vs 63.2%] and managing disclosures [8.3% vs 26.3%]. 45.8% vs 63.2% thought 'Routine DA enquiry was a great idea…why hadn't we introduced earlier?' 8.3% pre-introduction respondents had some reservations vs 0% post-introduction. Discussion/conclusion: Staff engagement in routine DA enquiry was high from the outset and improved over 6 months. Levels of experience and confidence in DA enquiry and disclosure management improved dramatically over this period. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Sexually transmitted infections. Volume 92(2016)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Sexually transmitted infections
- Issue:
- Volume 92(2016)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 92, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 92
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0092-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- A69
- Page End:
- A70
- Publication Date:
- 2016-06-30
- Subjects:
- Sexually transmitted diseases -- Periodicals
HIV infections -- Periodicals
616.951005 - Journal URLs:
- http://sti.bmj.com/ ↗
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/176/ ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052718.198 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1368-4973
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17880.xml