Hospital-based quality improvement interventions for patients with heart failure: a systematic review. Issue 6 (30th January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Agarwal, Anubha; Bahiru, Ehete; Yoo, Sang Gune Kyle; Berendsen, Mark A; Harikrishnan, Sivadasanpillai; Hernandez, Adrian F; Prabhakaran, Dorairaj; Huffman, Mark D
• Is Part Of: Heart. Volume 105:Issue 6(2019)
• Page Start: 431
• Page End: 438
• Publication Date: 2019-01-30
• Subjects: heart failure -- quality and outcomes of care -- systemic review; Heart -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314129
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1355-6037

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To estimate the direction and magnitude of effect and quality of evidence for hospital-based heart failure (HF) quality improvement interventions on process of care measures and clinical outcomes among patients with acute HF. Review methods: We performed a structured search to identify relevant randomised trials evaluating the effect of in-hospital quality improvement interventions for patients hospitalised with HF through February 2017. Studies were independently reviewed in duplicate for key characteristics, outcomes were summarised and a qualitative synthesis was performed due to substantial heterogeneity. Results: From 3615 records, 14 randomised controlled trials were identified for inclusion with multifaceted interventions. There was a trend towards higher in-hospital use of ACE inhibitors (ACE-I; 57.9%vs40.0%) and beta-blockers (BBs; 46.7%vs10.2%) in the intervention than the comparator in one trial (n=429 participants). Five trials (n=78 727 participants) demonstrated no effect of the intervention on use of ACE-I or angiotensin receptor blocker at discharge. Three trials (n=89 660 participants) reported no effect on use of BB at discharge. Two trials (n=419 participants) demonstrated a trend towards lower hospital readmission up to 90 days after discharge. There was no consistent effect of the quality improvement intervention on 30-day all-cause mortality, hospital length of stay and patient-level health-related quality of life. Conclusions: Randomised trials of hospital-based HF quality improvement interventions do not show a consistent effect on most process of care measures and clinical outcomes. The overall quality of evidence for the prespecified primary and key secondary outcomes was very low to moderate, suggesting that future research will likely influence these estimates. Trial registration number: CRD42016049545.