A blood-based prognostic biomarker in IBD. Issue 8 (27th April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Biasci, Daniele; Lee, James C; Noor, Nurulamin M; Pombal, Diana R; Hou, Monica; Lewis, Nina; Ahmad, Tariq; Hart, Ailsa; Parkes, Miles; McKinney, Eoin F; Lyons, Paul A; Smith, Kenneth G C
• Is Part Of: Gut. Volume 68:Issue 8(2019)
• Page Start: 1386
• Page End: 1395
• Publication Date: 2019-04-27
• Subjects: crohn's disease -- ulcerative colitis -- gene expression -- Ibd clinical -- Ibd basic besearch; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318343
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-5749

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: We have previously described a prognostic transcriptional signature in CD8 T cells that separates patients with IBD into two phenotypically distinct subgroups, termed IBD1 and IBD2. Here we sought to develop a blood-based test that could identify these subgroups without cell separation, and thus be suitable for clinical use in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Design: Patients with active IBD were recruited before treatment. Transcriptomic analyses were performed on purified CD8 T cells and/or whole blood. Phenotype data were collected prospectively. IBD1/IBD2 patient subgroups were identified by consensus clustering of CD8 T cell transcriptomes. In a training cohort, machine learning was used to identify groups of genes ('classifiers') whose differential expression in whole blood recreated the IBD1/IBD2 subgroups. Genes from the best classifiers were quantitative (q)PCR optimised, and further machine learning was used to identify the optimal qPCR classifier, which was locked down for further testing. Independent validation was sought in separate cohorts of patients with CD (n=66) and UC (n=57). Results: In both validation cohorts, a 17-gene qPCR-based classifier stratified patients into two distinct subgroups. Irrespective of the underlying diagnosis, IBDhi patients (analogous to the poor prognosis IBD1 subgroup) experienced significantly more aggressive disease than IBDlo patients (analogous to IBD2), with earlier need for treatment escalation (hazard ratio=2.65 (CD), 3.12 (UC)) and more escalations over time (for multiple escalations within 18 months: sensitivity=72.7% (CD), 100% (UC); negative predictive value=90.9% (CD), 100% (UC)). Conclusion: This is the first validated prognostic biomarker that can predict prognosis in newly diagnosed patients with IBD and represents a step towards personalised therapy.