Hospital bed capacity and usage across secondary healthcare providers in England during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis. Issue 1 (26th January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mateen, Bilal Akhter; Wilde, Harrison; Dennis, John M; Duncan, Andrew; Thomas, Nick; McGovern, Andrew; Denaxas, Spiros; Keeling, Matt; Vollmer, Sebastian
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 11:Issue 1(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-01-26
• Subjects: COVID-19 -- intensive & critical care -- public health -- health policy; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042945
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: In this study, we describe the pattern of bed occupancy across England during the peak of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: Descriptive survey. Setting: All non-specialist secondary care providers in England from 27 March27to 5 June 2020. Participants: Acute (non-specialist) trusts with a type 1 (ie, 24 hours/day, consultant-led) accident and emergency department (n=125), Nightingale (field) hospitals (n=7) and independent sector secondary care providers (n=195). Main outcome measures: Two thresholds for 'safe occupancy' were used: 85% as per the Royal College of Emergency Medicine and 92% as per NHS Improvement. Results: At peak availability, there were 2711 additional beds compatible with mechanical ventilation across England, reflecting a 53% increase in capacity, and occupancy never exceeded 62%. A consequence of the repurposing of beds meant that at the trough there were 8.7% (8508) fewer general and acute beds across England, but occupancy never exceeded 72%. The closest to full occupancy of general and acute bed (surge) capacity that any trust in England reached was 99.8% . For beds compatible with mechanical ventilation there were 326 trust-days (3.7%) spent above 85% of surge capacity and 154 trust-days (1.8%) spent above 92%. 23 trusts spent a cumulative 81 days at 100% saturation of their surge ventilator bed capacity (median number of days per trust=1, range: 1–17). However, only three sustainability and transformation partnerships (aggregates of geographically co-located trusts) reached 100% saturation of their mechanical ventilation beds. Conclusions: Throughout the first wave of the pandemic, an adequate supply of all bed types existed at a national level. However, due to an unequal distribution of bed utilisation, many trusts spent a significant period operating above 'safe-occupancy' thresholds despite substantial capacity in geographically co-located trusts, a key operational issue to address in preparing for future waves.