Effects of implementing Pressure Ulcer Prevention Practice Guidelines (PUPPG) in the prevention of pressure ulcers among hospitalised elderly patients: a systematic review protocol. Issue 3 (12th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wung Buh, Amos; Mahmoud, Hassan; Chen, Wenjun; McInnes, Matthew D F; Fergusson, Dean A
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 11:Issue 3(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-03-12
• Subjects: geriatric dermatology -- geriatric medicine -- protocols & guidelines -- orthopaedic & trauma surgery -- wound management; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043042
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Pressure ulcers are serious and potentially life-threatening problems across all age groups and across all medical specialties and care settings. The hospitalised elderly population is the most common group to develop pressure ulcers. This study aims to systematically review studies implementing pressure ulcer prevention strategies recommended in the Pressure Ulcer Prevention Practice Guidelines for the prevention of pressure ulcers among hospitalised elderly patients globally. Methods and analysis: A systematic review of all studies that have assessed the use of pressure ulcer prevention strategies in hospital settings among hospitalised elderly patients shall be conducted. A comprehensive search of all published articles in Medline Ovid, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Scopus and Web of Science will be done using terms such as pressure ulcers, prevention strategies, elderly patients and hospital. Studies will be screened for eligibility through title, abstract and full text by two independent reviewers. Study quality and risk of bias will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute for Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument. If sufficient data are available, a meta-analysis will be conducted to synthesise the effect size reported as OR with 95% CIs using both fixed and random effect models. I 2 statistics and visual inspection of the forest plots will be used to assess heterogeneity and identify the potential sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias will be assessed by visual inspections of funnel plots and Egger's test. Ethics and dissemination: No formal ethical approval or consent is required as no primary data will be collected. We aim to publish the research findings in a peer-reviewed scientific journal to promote knowledge transfer, as well as in conferences, seminars, congresses or symposia in a traditional manner. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019129088.