Strategies for developing and implementing a rheumatoid arthritis healthcare quality framework: a thematic analysis of perspectives from arthritis stakeholders. Issue 3 (5th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barber, Claire; Lacaille, Diane; Hall, Marc; Bohm, Victoria; Li, Linda C; Barnabe, Cheryl; Rankin, James; Hazlewood, Glen; Marshall, Deborah A; Macmullan, Paul; Mosher, Dianne; Homik, Joanne; English, Kelly; Tsui, Karen; Then, Karen L
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 11:Issue 3(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-03-05
• Subjects: rheumatology -- qualitative research -- quality in health care; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043759
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To obtain stakeholder perspectives to inform the development and implementation of a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) healthcare quality measurement framework. Design: Qualitative study using thematic analysis of focus groups and interviews. Setting: Arthritis stakeholders from across Canada including healthcare providers, persons living with RA, clinic managers and policy leaders were recruited for the focus groups and interviews. Participants: Fifty-four stakeholders from nine provinces. Interventions: Qualitative researchers led each focus group/interview using a semistructured guide; the digitally recorded data were transcribed verbatim. Two teams of two coders independently analysed the transcripts using thematic analysis. Results: Perspectives on the use of different types of measurement frameworks in healthcare were obtained. In particular, stakeholders advocated for the use of existing healthcare frameworks over frameworks developed in the business world and adapted for healthcare. Persons living with RA were less familiar with specific measurement frameworks, however, they had used existing online public forums for rating their experience and quality of healthcare provided. They viewed a standardised framework as potentially useful for assisting with monitoring the care provided to them individually. Nine guiding principles for framework development and 13 measurement themes were identified. Perceived barriers identified included access to data and concerns about how measures in the framework were developed and used. Effective approaches to framework implementation included having sound knowledge translation strategies and involving stakeholders throughout the measurement development and reporting process. Clinical models of care and health policies conducive to outcome measurement were highlighted as drivers of successful measurement initiatives. Conclusion: These important perspectives will be used to inform a healthcare quality measurement framework for RA.