Effect of routinely assessing and addressing depression and diabetes distress using patient-reported outcome measures in improving outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review protocol. Issue 3 (15th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: McMorrow, Rita; Hunter, Barbara; Hendrieckx, Christel; Kwasnicka, Dominika; Cussen, Leanne; Ho, Felicia Ching Siew; Speight, Jane; Emery, Jon; Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 11:Issue 3(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-03-15
• Subjects: general diabetes -- depression & mood disorders -- diabetes & endocrinology; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044888
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Type 2 diabetes is a global health priority. People with diabetes are more likely to experience mental health problems relative to people without diabetes. Diabetes guidelines recommend assessment of depression and diabetes distress during diabetes care. This systematic review will examine the effect of routinely assessing and addressing depression and diabetes distress using patient-reported outcome measures in improving outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods and analysis: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Complete, PsycInfo, The Cochrane Library and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched using a prespecified strategy using a prespecified Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, Setting and study design strategy. The date range of the search of all databases will be from inception to 3 August 2020. Randomised controlled trials, interrupted time-series studies, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case–control studies and analytical cross-sectional studies published in peer-reviewed journals in the English language will be included. Two review authors will independently screen abstracts and full texts with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer, if required, using Covidence software. Two reviewers will undertake risk of bias assessment using checklists appropriate to study design. Data will be extracted using prespecified template. A narrative synthesis will be conducted, with a meta-analysis, if appropriate. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval is not required for this review of published studies. Presentation of results will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020200246.