Comparing CT colonography and flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomised trial within a population-based screening programme. Issue 8 (12th April 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparing CT colonography and flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomised trial within a population-based screening programme. Issue 8 (12th April 2016)
- Main Title:
- Comparing CT colonography and flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomised trial within a population-based screening programme
- Authors:
- Regge, Daniele
Iussich, Gabriella
Segnan, Nereo
Correale, Loredana
Hassan, Cesare
Arrigoni, Arrigo
Asnaghi, Roberto
Bestagini, Piero
Bulighin, Gianmarco
Cassinis, Maria Carla
Ederle, Andrea
Ferraris, Andrea
Galatola, Giovanni
Gallo, Teresa
Gandini, Giovanni
Garretti, Licia
Martina, Maria Cristina
Molinar, Daniela
Montemezzi, Stefania
Morra, Lia
Motton, Massimiliano
Occhipinti, Pietro
Pinali, Lucia
Soardi, Gian Alberto
Senore, Carlo - Other Names:
- Laudi C author non-byline.
Campanella D author non-byline.
Valle P G author non-byline.
Musso S author non-byline.
Fracchia M author non-byline.
Lavagna A author non-byline.
Crocellà L author non-byline.
Rocca R author non-byline.
Bertone A author non-byline.
Mondardini A author non-byline.
Pennazio M author non-byline.
Sprujievnik T author non-byline.
Silvani M author non-byline.
Capuano A author non-byline.
Martinasso G author non-byline.
Falco P author non-byline.
De Bandi M author non-byline.
Fontanili G author non-byline.
Cecchin D author non-byline.
Ntakirutimana E author non-byline.
Chioffi M C author non-byline.
Magnani C author non-byline.
Broglia L author non-byline.
Saettone S author non-byline.
Comi G author non-byline.
Calcara C author non-byline.
Ferrero F author non-byline.
Azzoni A author non-byline.
Debernardi S author non-byline.
Marutti A author non-byline.
Mutti B author non-byline.
Simonetti S author non-byline.
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Importance and aims: The role of CT colonography (CTC) as a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test is uncertain. The aim of our trial was to compare participation and detection rate (DR) with sigmoidoscopy (flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS)) and CTC in a screening setting. Design setting and participants: We conducted two randomised clinical trials (RCTs). (1) Participation RCT: individuals, aged 58 years, living in Turin (Italy), were randomly assigned to be invited to FS or CTC screening; (2) detection RCT: residents in northern Italy, aged 58–60, giving their consent to recruitment, were randomly allocated to CTC or FS. Polyps ≥6 mm at CTC, or 'high-risk' distal lesions at FS, were referred for colonoscopy (TC). Main outcome measures: Participation rate (proportion of invitees examined); DR of advanced adenomas or CRC (advanced neoplasia (AN)). Results: Participation was 30.4% (298/980) for CTC and 27.4% (267/976) for FS (relative risk (RR) 1.1; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.29). Among men, participation was higher with CTC than with FS (34.1% vs 26.5%, p=0.011). In the detection RCT, 2673 subjects had FS and 2595 had CTC: the AN DR was 4.8% (127/2673, including 9 CRCs) with FS and 5.1% (133/2595, including 10 CRCs) with CTC (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.37). Distal AN DR was 3.9% (109/2673) with FS and 2.9% (76/2595) with CTC (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.96); proximal AN DR was 1.2% (34/2595) for FS vs 2.7% (69/2595) for CTC (RR 2.06; 95% CI 1.37 to 3.10). Conclusions and relevance:Abstract : Importance and aims: The role of CT colonography (CTC) as a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test is uncertain. The aim of our trial was to compare participation and detection rate (DR) with sigmoidoscopy (flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS)) and CTC in a screening setting. Design setting and participants: We conducted two randomised clinical trials (RCTs). (1) Participation RCT: individuals, aged 58 years, living in Turin (Italy), were randomly assigned to be invited to FS or CTC screening; (2) detection RCT: residents in northern Italy, aged 58–60, giving their consent to recruitment, were randomly allocated to CTC or FS. Polyps ≥6 mm at CTC, or 'high-risk' distal lesions at FS, were referred for colonoscopy (TC). Main outcome measures: Participation rate (proportion of invitees examined); DR of advanced adenomas or CRC (advanced neoplasia (AN)). Results: Participation was 30.4% (298/980) for CTC and 27.4% (267/976) for FS (relative risk (RR) 1.1; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.29). Among men, participation was higher with CTC than with FS (34.1% vs 26.5%, p=0.011). In the detection RCT, 2673 subjects had FS and 2595 had CTC: the AN DR was 4.8% (127/2673, including 9 CRCs) with FS and 5.1% (133/2595, including 10 CRCs) with CTC (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.37). Distal AN DR was 3.9% (109/2673) with FS and 2.9% (76/2595) with CTC (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.96); proximal AN DR was 1.2% (34/2595) for FS vs 2.7% (69/2595) for CTC (RR 2.06; 95% CI 1.37 to 3.10). Conclusions and relevance: Participation and DR for FS and CTC were comparable. AN DR was twice as high in the proximal colon and lower in the distal colon with CTC than with FS. Men were more likely to participate in CTC screening. Trial registration number: NCT01739608; Pre-results. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Gut. Volume 66:Issue 8(2017)
- Journal:
- Gut
- Issue:
- Volume 66:Issue 8(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 66, Issue 8 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 66
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0066-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 1434
- Page End:
- 1440
- Publication Date:
- 2016-04-12
- Subjects:
- COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING -- COLONIC NEOPLASMS
Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://gut.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311278 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0017-5749
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17809.xml