Biogeographic drivers of distribution and abundance in an alien ecosystem engineer: Transboundary range expansion, barriers to spread, and spatial structure. (4th May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ma, Kevin C. K.; Gusha, Molline N. C.; Zardi, Gerardo I.; Nicastro, Katy R.; Monsinjon, Jonathan R.; McQuaid, Christopher D.
• Other Names: Bernardi Giacomo handlingEditor.
• Is Part Of: Journal of biogeography. Volume 48:Number 8(2021)
• Page Start: 1941
• Page End: 1959
• Publication Date: 2021-05-04
• Subjects: biogeographic barriers -- biogeographic transitions -- biological invasion -- bioregions -- Mytilidae -- Mytilus galloprovincialis -- southern Africa; Biogeography -- Periodicals; 578.09
• DOI: 10.1111/jbi.14124
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0305-0270

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: Biogeographic boundaries can act as either weak or strong barriers to the spread of species undergoing distributional change. Once a novel species spreads across a boundary, it can have a substantial impact on the ecosystem, for instance by competing with local species, and, over the long‐term, re‐engineer the ecosystem. Marine biogeographic regions are clearly defined on the coast of southern Africa and we tested the influence of their boundaries on the spread and spatial structure of an alien ecosystem engineer. Location: Southern Africa. Taxon: An invasive mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis . Methods: Records of M. galloprovincialis were compiled into a database to determine its decadal patterns of spread across multiple bioregions. Distribution and abundance (estimated using density and semi‐quantitative abundance scale [ACFOR]) of this mussel were surveyed to determine patterns in spatial structure across bioregions. In addition, we compared the size structure of populations at the eastern margins of its range with those of larger populations nearer the range centre. Results: Initial breaching of biogeographic boundaries was associated with rapid spread, but other boundaries encountered decades later acted as barriers to further spread. Across >2, 800 km of coast, spatial autocorrelation was observed in densities (low and mid shore levels) and in ACFOR abundances. Repeating spatial patterns in densities and ACFOR abundance were detected at scales of 120–160 km and of 400–990 km. Considerable effort was required to detect populations at the absolute eastern limits of its distribution. Main conclusion: Detection of spatial structures at multiple scales suggests that ecologically determined processes regulate abundance at both intra‐bioregional and inter‐bioregional scales, which may help tease apart the historic and contemporary consequences of interspecific interactions on the structure of rocky shore communities. This study demonstrates the influence of biogeography in driving temporal patterns of spread and spatial structure on the distribution and abundance of an invasive species.