054 Transforming Evidence From Multiple Guidelines Into User Friendly Clinical Practice Tools For Remote Cancer Treatment-Related Symptom Management: The Costars Project. (15th August 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 054 Transforming Evidence From Multiple Guidelines Into User Friendly Clinical Practice Tools For Remote Cancer Treatment-Related Symptom Management: The Costars Project. (15th August 2013)
- Main Title:
- 054 Transforming Evidence From Multiple Guidelines Into User Friendly Clinical Practice Tools For Remote Cancer Treatment-Related Symptom Management: The Costars Project
- Authors:
- Stacey, D
Carley, M
Harrison, M - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: To transform evidence from guidelines for clinical practice tools for remote management of patients experiencing symptoms related to cancer treatment. Clinical practice protocols are defined as user-friendly knowledge translation tools to support patient care. These tools narrow the know-do gap by presenting the best available evidence from guidelines while using a format that is sensitive to how nurses think and what nurses do. Methods: Mixed methods descriptive study guided by CAN-IMPLEMENT©. The process involved: a) conducting a systematic search for guidelines; b) developing symptom-specific protocols using evidence from quality appraised clinical practice guidelines; c) reaching consensus on the clinical practice protocol template, and d) validating the clinical practice protocols. Results: Clinical practice protocols were developed and validated for 13 symptoms using 42 clinical practice guidelines with a median of 3 guidelines per protocol (range 1 for bleeding to 7 vomiting). For the first two protocols, source guideline AGREE rigour subscale ratings ranged from 8% to 86% (median 60.1; diarrhoea; 40.5 fever). The protocols were developed using guidelines, symptom severity questions included the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, and iterative feedback from practicing nurses. Usability testing revealed: high readability, just the right amount of information, and appropriate terms. Access to protocols needs to be tailored to individual practicesAbstract : Objectives: To transform evidence from guidelines for clinical practice tools for remote management of patients experiencing symptoms related to cancer treatment. Clinical practice protocols are defined as user-friendly knowledge translation tools to support patient care. These tools narrow the know-do gap by presenting the best available evidence from guidelines while using a format that is sensitive to how nurses think and what nurses do. Methods: Mixed methods descriptive study guided by CAN-IMPLEMENT©. The process involved: a) conducting a systematic search for guidelines; b) developing symptom-specific protocols using evidence from quality appraised clinical practice guidelines; c) reaching consensus on the clinical practice protocol template, and d) validating the clinical practice protocols. Results: Clinical practice protocols were developed and validated for 13 symptoms using 42 clinical practice guidelines with a median of 3 guidelines per protocol (range 1 for bleeding to 7 vomiting). For the first two protocols, source guideline AGREE rigour subscale ratings ranged from 8% to 86% (median 60.1; diarrhoea; 40.5 fever). The protocols were developed using guidelines, symptom severity questions included the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, and iterative feedback from practicing nurses. Usability testing revealed: high readability, just the right amount of information, and appropriate terms. Access to protocols needs to be tailored to individual practices (e.g. electronic application, access to paper-based versions). Nurses requested training and support to implement them. Discussion: These tools, created from guidelines, transform evidence into user-friendly protocols for use by nurses when guiding patients at home to better manage their cancer treatment-related symptoms. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ quality & safety. Volume 22(2013)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- BMJ quality & safety
- Issue:
- Volume 22(2013)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 1 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0022-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- A29
- Page End:
- A29
- Publication Date:
- 2013-08-15
- Subjects:
- Medical care -- Quality control -- Periodicals
Health facilities -- Risk management -- Periodicals
Medical errors -- Prevention -- Periodicals
362.106805 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002293.85 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-5415
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17813.xml