Variation of synovial fluid leucocyte cell count and polymorphonuclear percentage in patients with aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty. (2nd August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fuchs, Michael; Kirchhoff, Felix; Reichel, Heiko; Perka, Carsten; Faschingbauer, Martin; Gwinner, Clemens
• Is Part Of: Bone & joint open. Volume 2:Number 8(2021)
• Page Start: 576
• Page End: 582
• Publication Date: 2021-08-02
• Subjects: Periprosthetic Joint Infection -- Total Knee arthroplasty -- White Blood Cell Count -- Joint Aspiration -- Synovial Analysis; Synovial fluid -- leucocytes -- aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty -- Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) -- joint aspirations -- revision surgery -- Joint Infection -- knee joints -- Musculoskeletal Infection -- implant loosening; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; Musculoskeletal system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.47
• DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.28.BJO-2021-0109
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2633-1462

Abstract

Abstract : Aims: Current guidelines consider analyses of joint aspirates, including leucocyte cell count (LC) and polymorphonuclear percentage (PMN%) as a diagnostic mainstay of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). It is unclear if these parameters are subject to a certain degree of variability over time. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the variation of LC and PMN% in patients with aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: We conducted a prospective, double-centre study of 40 patients with 40 knee joints. Patients underwent joint aspiration at two different time points with a maximum period of 120 days in between these interventions and without any events such as other joint aspirations or surgeries. The main indications for TKA revision surgery were aseptic implant loosening (n = 24) and joint instability (n = 11). Results: Overall, 80 synovial fluid samples of 40 patients were analyzed. The average time period between the joint aspirations was 50 days (SD 32). There was a significantly higher percentage change in LC when compared to PMN% (44.1% (SD 28.6%) vs 27.3% (SD 23.7%); p = 0.003). When applying standard definition criteria, LC counts were found to skip back and forth between the two time points with exceeding the thresholds in up to 20% of cases, which was significantly more compared to PMN% for the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria (p = 0.001), as well as for Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) (p = 0.029). Conclusion: LC and PMN% are subject to considerable variation. According to its higher interindividual variance, LC evaluation might contribute to false-positive or false-negative results in PJI assessment. Single LC testing prior to TKA revision surgery seems to be insufficient to exclude PJI. On the basis of the obtained results, PMN% analyses overrule LC measurements with regard to a conclusive diagnostic algorithm. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):566–572.