Rendered invisible: Institutional misrecognition and the reproduction of energy poverty. Issue 124 (August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Simcock, Neil; Frankowski, Jan; Bouzarovski, Stefan
• Is Part Of: Geoforum. Issue 124(2021)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 9
• Publication Date: 2021-08
• Subjects: Energy poverty -- Fuel poverty -- Energy justice -- Misrecognition; Geography -- Periodicals; Human geography -- Periodicals; Regional planning -- Periodicals; Sciences de la terre -- Périodiques; Géographie -- Périodiques; Géographie humaine -- Périodiques; Aménagement du territoire -- Périodiques; Earth sciences; Geography; Human geography; Regional planning; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 304.205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.05.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-7185

Abstract

Highlights: Argues that misrecognition is central to the reproduction of energy poverty. Draws on in-depth interviews with policy makers and NGO experts in Poland. Those suffering energy poverty were ignored and stigmatised in dominant policy discourse. These forms of misrecognition directly influenced policies at national and local scales. Addressing energy inequalities requires increasing recognition and challenging stigmatisation. Abstract: This paper makes the case that a lack of political and institutional recognition underpins the (re)production of domestic energy poverty. Previous research into the drivers of energy poverty has tended to focus on household-scale material and economic factors, with relatively little attention paid to the symbolic structures that act to legitimise deprivation. To evidence our argument, we draw on a case study of Poland during the period 2010–2015, conducted via in-depth interviews with high-level decision-makers and experts. We utilise Nancy Fraser's concept of 'misrecognition' to argue that during this period those suffering from energy poverty were discursively marginalised in two interlinked ways. First, 'non-recognition', in that the lived reality of energy poverty and the complexity of its causes were largely 'rendered invisible' in mainstream political and policy discourse. Second, 'disrespect', in that many dominant understandings of and responses to energy poverty were informed by narratives based on stigmatisation and othering. We demonstrate how these forms of misrecognition actively fed into policy design and operation at both national and local scales, ultimately contributing to the reproduction of energy poverty. We conclude by arguing that a progressive politics to address energy inequalities is predicated upon a symbolic strategy that involves raising awareness about the existence and prevalence of energy poverty, whilst also challenging narratives that frame disadvantaged groups as individually responsible for their own deprivation.