A phase 3, open-label, controlled, randomized, multicenter trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of StrataGraft® construct in patients with deep partial-thickness thermal burns. Issue 5 (August 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A phase 3, open-label, controlled, randomized, multicenter trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of StrataGraft® construct in patients with deep partial-thickness thermal burns. Issue 5 (August 2021)
- Main Title:
- A phase 3, open-label, controlled, randomized, multicenter trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of StrataGraft® construct in patients with deep partial-thickness thermal burns
- Authors:
- Gibson, Angela L.F.
Holmes, James H.
Shupp, Jeffrey W.
Smith, David
Joe, Victor
Carson, Joshua
Litt, Jeffrey
Kahn, Steven
Short, Tracee
Cancio, Leopoldo
Rizzo, Julie
Carter, Jeffrey E.
Foster, Kevin
Lokuta, Mary A.
Comer, Allen R.
Smiell, Janice M.
Allen-Hoffmann, B. Lynn - Abstract:
- Highlights: StrataGraft treatment eliminated donor tissue harvest in all but 3 of 71 patients. At Month 3, 92% of StrataGraft treatment sites achieved durable wound closure. Donor-site pain was a favorable outcome of significantly reduced autograft use. Cosmesis at StrataGraft/autograft treatment sites were clinically similar at Month 12. The most common treatment-related adverse event was pruritis, which occurred in 11 patients. Abstract: Objective: This phase 3 study evaluated StrataGraft construct as a donor-site sparing alternative to autograft in patients with deep partial-thickness (DPT) burns. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with 3–49% total body surface area (TBSA) thermal burns were enrolled. In each patient, 2 DPT areas (≤2000 cm 2 total) of comparable depth after excision were randomized to either cryopreserved StrataGraft or autograft. Coprimary endpoints were: the difference in percent area of StrataGraft treatment site and autograft treatment site autografted at Month 3 (M3), and the proportion of patients achieving durable wound closure of the StrataGraft site without autograft at M3. Safety assessments were performed in all patients. Efficacy and safety follow-up continued to 1 year. Results: Seventy-one patients were enrolled. By M3, there was a 96% reduction in mean percent area of StrataGraft treatment sites that required autografting, compared with autograft treatment sites (4.3% vs 102.1%, respectively; P < .0001). StrataGraft treatment resulted inHighlights: StrataGraft treatment eliminated donor tissue harvest in all but 3 of 71 patients. At Month 3, 92% of StrataGraft treatment sites achieved durable wound closure. Donor-site pain was a favorable outcome of significantly reduced autograft use. Cosmesis at StrataGraft/autograft treatment sites were clinically similar at Month 12. The most common treatment-related adverse event was pruritis, which occurred in 11 patients. Abstract: Objective: This phase 3 study evaluated StrataGraft construct as a donor-site sparing alternative to autograft in patients with deep partial-thickness (DPT) burns. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with 3–49% total body surface area (TBSA) thermal burns were enrolled. In each patient, 2 DPT areas (≤2000 cm 2 total) of comparable depth after excision were randomized to either cryopreserved StrataGraft or autograft. Coprimary endpoints were: the difference in percent area of StrataGraft treatment site and autograft treatment site autografted at Month 3 (M3), and the proportion of patients achieving durable wound closure of the StrataGraft site without autograft at M3. Safety assessments were performed in all patients. Efficacy and safety follow-up continued to 1 year. Results: Seventy-one patients were enrolled. By M3, there was a 96% reduction in mean percent area of StrataGraft treatment sites that required autografting, compared with autograft treatment sites (4.3% vs 102.1%, respectively; P < .0001). StrataGraft treatment resulted in durable wound closure at M3 without autografting in 92% (95% CI: 85.6, 98.8; n/n 59/64) of patients for whom data were available. The most common StrataGraft-related adverse event was pruritus (15%). Conclusions: Both coprimary endpoints were achieved. StrataGraft may offer a new treatment for DPT burns to reduce the need for autografting. Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT03005106 . … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Burns. Volume 47:Issue 5(2021)
- Journal:
- Burns
- Issue:
- Volume 47:Issue 5(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 47, Issue 5 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0047-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 1024
- Page End:
- 1037
- Publication Date:
- 2021-08
- Subjects:
- BACC bioengineered allogeneic cellularized construct -- BSA bovine serum albumin -- CI confidence interval -- CRF case report form -- DPT deep partial-thickness -- FT full-thickness -- GMP Good Manufacturing Practice -- HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act -- HTS hypertrophic scarring -- ITT intent to treat -- MI multiple imputation -- mITT modified intent to treat -- PRA panel reactive antibody -- POSAS Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale -- SAE serious adverse event -- TBSA total body surface area -- TEAE treatment-emergent adverse event
Autograft -- Bioengineered allogeneic cellularized construct -- Deep partial-thickness burn -- Randomized controlled trial -- Skin substitute -- StrataGraft
Burns and scalds -- Periodicals
617.11 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03054179 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.burns.2021.04.021 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0305-4179
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2931.728000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17785.xml