Performance and operational feasibility of antigen and antibody rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in Cameroon: a clinical, prospective, diagnostic accuracy study. Issue 8 (August 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Performance and operational feasibility of antigen and antibody rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in Cameroon: a clinical, prospective, diagnostic accuracy study. Issue 8 (August 2021)
- Main Title:
- Performance and operational feasibility of antigen and antibody rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in Cameroon: a clinical, prospective, diagnostic accuracy study
- Authors:
- Boum, Yap
Fai, Karl Njuwa
Nikolay, Birgit
Mboringong, Akenji Blaise
Bebell, Lisa M
Ndifon, Mark
Abbah, Aristide
Essaka, Rachel
Eteki, Lucrèce
Luquero, Francisco
Langendorf, Céline
Mbarga, Nicole Fouda
Essomba, Rene Ghislain
Buri, Bongkiyung Donald
Corine, Tchoula Mamiafo
Kameni, Bertrand Tchualeu
Mandeng, Nadia
Fanne, Mahamat
Bisseck, Anne-Cécile Zoung-Kani
Ndongmo, Clement B
Eyangoh, Sara
Hamadou, Achta
Ouamba, Jean Patrick
Koku, Modeste Tamakloé
Njouom, Richard
Claire, Okomo Marie
Esso, Linda
Epée, Emilienne
Mballa, Georges Alain Etoundi - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: Real-time PCR is recommended to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, PCR availability is restricted in most countries. Rapid diagnostic tests are considered acceptable alternatives, but data are lacking on their performance. We assessed the performance of four antibody-based rapid diagnostic tests and one antigen-based rapid diagnostic test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in the community in Cameroon. Methods: In this clinical, prospective, diagnostic accuracy study, we enrolled individuals aged at least 21 years who were either symptomatic and suspected of having COVID-19 or asymptomatic and presented for screening. We tested peripheral blood for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using the Innovita (Biological Technology; Beijing, China), Wondfo (Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech; Guangzhou, China), SD Biosensor (SD Biosensor; Gyeonggi-do, South Korea), and Runkun tests (Runkun Pharmaceutical; Hunan, China), and nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 antigen using the SD Biosensor test. Antigen rapid diagnostic tests were compared with Abbott PCR testing (Abbott; Abbott Park, IL, USA), and antibody rapid diagnostic tests were compared with Biomerieux immunoassays (Biomerieux; Marcy l'Etoile, France). We retrospectively tested two diagnostic algorithms that incorporated rapid diagnostic tests for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients using simulation modelling. Findings: 1195 participants were enrolled in the study. 347 (29%) tested SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive, 223 (19%) rapidSummary: Background: Real-time PCR is recommended to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, PCR availability is restricted in most countries. Rapid diagnostic tests are considered acceptable alternatives, but data are lacking on their performance. We assessed the performance of four antibody-based rapid diagnostic tests and one antigen-based rapid diagnostic test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in the community in Cameroon. Methods: In this clinical, prospective, diagnostic accuracy study, we enrolled individuals aged at least 21 years who were either symptomatic and suspected of having COVID-19 or asymptomatic and presented for screening. We tested peripheral blood for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using the Innovita (Biological Technology; Beijing, China), Wondfo (Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech; Guangzhou, China), SD Biosensor (SD Biosensor; Gyeonggi-do, South Korea), and Runkun tests (Runkun Pharmaceutical; Hunan, China), and nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 antigen using the SD Biosensor test. Antigen rapid diagnostic tests were compared with Abbott PCR testing (Abbott; Abbott Park, IL, USA), and antibody rapid diagnostic tests were compared with Biomerieux immunoassays (Biomerieux; Marcy l'Etoile, France). We retrospectively tested two diagnostic algorithms that incorporated rapid diagnostic tests for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients using simulation modelling. Findings: 1195 participants were enrolled in the study. 347 (29%) tested SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive, 223 (19%) rapid diagnostic test antigen-positive, and 478 (40%) rapid diagnostic test antibody-positive. Antigen-based rapid diagnostic test sensitivity was 80·0% (95% CI 71·0–88·0) in the first 7 days after symptom onset, but antibody-based rapid diagnostic tests had only 26·8% sensitivity (18·3–36·8). Antibody rapid diagnostic test sensitivity increased to 76·4% (70·1–82·0) 14 days after symptom onset. Among asymptomatic participants, the sensitivity of antigen-based and antibody-based rapid diagnostic tests were 37·0% (27·0–48·0) and 50·7% (42·2–59·1), respectively. Cohen's κ showed substantial agreement between Wondfo antibody rapid diagnostic test and gold-standard ELISA (κ=0·76; sensitivity 0·98) and between Biosensor and ELISA (κ=0·60; sensitivity 0·94). Innovita (κ=0·47; sensitivity 0·93) and Runkun (κ=0·43; sensitivity 0·76) showed moderate agreement. An antigen-based retrospective algorithm applied to symptomatic patients showed 94·0% sensitivity and 91·0% specificity in the first 7 days after symptom onset. For asymptomatic participants, the algorithm showed a sensitivity of 34% (95% CI 23·0–44·0) and a specificity of 92·0% (88·0–96·0). Interpretation: Rapid diagnostic tests had good overall sensitivity for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection. Rapid diagnostic tests could be incorporated into efficient testing algorithms as an alternative to PCR to decrease diagnostic delays and onward viral transmission. Funding: Médecins Sans Frontières WACA and Médecins Sans Frontières OCG. Translations: For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Lancet infectious diseases. Volume 21:Issue 8(2021)
- Journal:
- Lancet infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 21:Issue 8(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 21, Issue 8 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 21
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0021-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 1089
- Page End:
- 1096
- Publication Date:
- 2021-08
- Subjects:
- Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
Communicable Diseases -- Periodicals
Infection -- Periodicals
Maladies infectieuses -- Périodiques
Infection -- Périodiques
Communicable diseases
Infection
Periodicals
616.905 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.mdconsult.com/public/search?search_type=journal&j_sort=pub_date&j_issn=1473-3099 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14733099 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00132-8 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1473-3099
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5146.082000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17796.xml