Diffusion of knowledge and behaviours among trainee doctors in an acute medical unit and implications for quality improvement work: a mixed methods social network analysis. Issue 12 (10th December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sullivan, Paul; Saatchi, Ghazal; Younis, Izaba; Harris, Mary Louise
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 9:Issue 12(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-12-10
• Subjects: internal medicine -- change management -- medical education & training; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027039
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To describe the social networks that diffuse knowledge, attitudes and behaviours relating to different domains of practice within teams of trainee doctors in an acute hospital medical setting. The domains examined were 'clinical-technical', 'patient centredness' and 'organisation of work'. Design: Sequential mixed methods: (i) sociocentric survey of trainee consisting of questions about which colleagues are emulated or looked to for advice, with construction of social network maps, followed by (ii) semi-structured interviews regarding peer-to-peer influence, analysed using a grounded theory approach. The study took place over 24 months. Setting: An acute medical admissions unit, which receives admissions from the emergency department and primary care, in a National Health Service England teaching hospital. Participants: Trainee medical doctors working in five consecutive rotational teams. Surveys were done by 39 trainee doctors; then 15 different participants from a maximal diversity sample were interviewed. Results: Clinical-technical behaviours spread in a dense network with rich horizontal peer-to-peer connections. Patient-centred behaviours spread in a sparse network. Approaches to non-patient facing work are seldom copied from colleagues. Highly influential individuals for clinical technical memes were identified; high influencers were not identified for the other domains. Conclusion: Information and influence relating to different aspects of practice have different patterns of spread within teams of trainee doctors; highly influential individuals were important only for spread of clinical-technical practice. Influencers have particular characteristics, and this knowledge could guide leaders and teachers.