Identifying low-value clinical practices in critical care medicine: protocol for a scoping review. Issue 10 (28th October 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Identifying low-value clinical practices in critical care medicine: protocol for a scoping review. Issue 10 (28th October 2015)
- Main Title:
- Identifying low-value clinical practices in critical care medicine: protocol for a scoping review
- Authors:
- Niven, Daniel J
McCormick, T Jared
Straus, Sharon E
Hemmelgarn, Brenda R
Jeffs, Lianne P
Stelfox, Henry T - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: Reducing unnecessary, low-value clinical practice (ie, de-adoption) is key to improving value for money in healthcare, especially among patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) where resource consumption exceeds other medical and surgical populations. Research suggests that low-value clinical practices are common in medicine, however systematically and objectively identifying them is a widely cited barrier to de-adoption. We will conduct a scoping review to identify low-value clinical practices in adult critical care medicine that are candidates for de-adoption. Methods and analysis: We will systematically search the literature to identify all randomised controlled trials or systematic reviews that focus on diagnostic or therapeutic interventions in adult patients admitted to medical, surgical or specialty ICUs, and are published in 3 general medical journals with the highest impact factor ( New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association ). 2 investigators will independently screen abstracts and full-text articles against inclusion criteria, and extract data from included citations. Included citations will be classified according to whether or not they represent a repeat examination of the given research question (ie, replication research), and whether the results are similar or contradictory to the original study. Studies with contradictory results will determine clinical practices that areAbstract : Introduction: Reducing unnecessary, low-value clinical practice (ie, de-adoption) is key to improving value for money in healthcare, especially among patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) where resource consumption exceeds other medical and surgical populations. Research suggests that low-value clinical practices are common in medicine, however systematically and objectively identifying them is a widely cited barrier to de-adoption. We will conduct a scoping review to identify low-value clinical practices in adult critical care medicine that are candidates for de-adoption. Methods and analysis: We will systematically search the literature to identify all randomised controlled trials or systematic reviews that focus on diagnostic or therapeutic interventions in adult patients admitted to medical, surgical or specialty ICUs, and are published in 3 general medical journals with the highest impact factor ( New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association ). 2 investigators will independently screen abstracts and full-text articles against inclusion criteria, and extract data from included citations. Included citations will be classified according to whether or not they represent a repeat examination of the given research question (ie, replication research), and whether the results are similar or contradictory to the original study. Studies with contradictory results will determine clinical practices that are candidates for de-adoption. Ethics and dissemination: Our scoping review will use robust methodology to systematically identify a list of clinical practices in adult critical care medicine with evidence supporting their de-adoption. In addition to adding to advancing the study of de-adoption, this review may also serve as the launching point for clinicians and researchers in critical care to begin reducing the number of low-value clinical practices. Dissemination of these results to relevant stakeholders will include tailored presentations at local, national and international meetings, and publication of a manuscript. Ethical approval is not required for this study. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 5:Issue 10(2015)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 5:Issue 10(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 5, Issue 10 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0005-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10-28
- Subjects:
- STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008244 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17760.xml