Classification of dysplasia of the femoral trochlea in patients with patellar instability depends on the evaluation plane. Issue 6 (26th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yamada, Yuzo; Toritsuka, Yukiyoshi; Horibe, Shuji; Nakamura, Norimasa; Sugamoto, Kazuomi; Yoshikawa, Hideki; Shino, Konsei
• Is Part Of: Journal of ISAKOS. Volume 4:Issue 6(2019)
• Page Start: 290
• Page End: 295
• Publication Date: 2019-09-26
• Subjects: knee -- dislocation -- MRI; Joints -- Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals; Osteoarthritis -- Periodicals; Joints -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Total knee replacement -- Periodicals; Sports injuries -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; 617.472059705
• DOI: 10.1136/jisakos-2019-000291
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2059-7754

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: Trochlear dysplasia is a major predisposing factor of patellar instability (PI). Dysplasia types are generally evaluated using the Dejour classification, but it is unclear whether this classification covers the entire spectrum. The objective of this study was to confirm whether the trochlear types on an axial view categorised according to the classification represent the entire trochlear shape. Methods: Ninety knees from 81 patients with PI and 15 knees from 10 healthy volunteers (HVs) were evaluated. Three-dimensional knee models were created by MRIs. The femoral trochlear planes (FTPs) were defined as virtual cross sections including the transepicondylar axis, closer to the perpendicular plane of the articular surface. FTP 0 was defined as the reference plane including the proximal edge of the femoral trochlea and FTP θ as the plane making optional angle θ to FTP 0. Trochlear dysplasia types according to the classification were evaluated at every 10 degrees of FTPs up to 60 degrees (FTP 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60). A trochlea with a sulcus angle <145° was defined as normal. Changes in the trochlear type according to FTPs, and agreement with clinical classification were evaluated. Results: Eighty-six knees (96%) in patients with PI and 12 (80%) in HVs showed changing trochlear types in different FTPs. Patterns of change varied among patients with PI and HVs. This suggests morphological variation of dysplastic trochleae. Agreement of trochlear type on each FTP with the clinically used Dejour classification was 42% on FTP 10, 49% on FTP 20, 33% on FTP 30, 22% on FTP 40, 22% on FTP 50% and 22% on FTP 60 in patients with PI, and 20% at FTP 10, 80% at FTP 20 and 100% on FTP 30 through FTP 60 in HVs. This suggests that the trochlear types in the clinically used plane do not always match the ones on the planes describing the contact surface to the patella. Conclusion: The trochlear types on an axial view provided by the Dejour classification do not represent the entire trochlear geometry. Multiple axial planes should be clinically used to more precisely describe the entire trochlear shape.