Estimating dark diversity and species pools: an empirical assessment of two methods. Issue 1 (22nd August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lewis, Rob J.; Szava‐Kovats, Robert; Pärtel, Meelis
• Editors: Isaac, Nick
• Is Part Of: Methods in ecology and evolution. Volume 7:Issue 1(2016:Jan.)
• Page Start: 104
• Page End: 113
• Publication Date: 2015-08-22
• Subjects: Beal's smoothing -- co‐occurrence -- ecological requirements -- Ellenberg -- method comparison -- species beta‐niche; Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12443
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2041-210X

Abstract

Summary: Species absent from a community but with the potential to establish (dark diversity) are an important, yet rarely considered component of habitat‐specific species pools. Quantifying this component remains a challenge as dark diversity cannot be observed directly and must be estimated. Here, we empirically test whether species ecological requirements or species co‐occurrences provide accurate estimates of dark diversity. We used two spatially nested independent datasets, one comprising 3033 samples of coastal grassland vegetation from 4 m 2 and 200 m 2 plots from Scotland, UK, and another comprising 780 samples of forest vegetation plots from 30 m 2 and 500 m 2 plots from Switzerland. Dark diversity for each of the smaller scaled plots was estimated through investigating the degree of (i) similarity in ecological requirements (measured as Ellenberg values); and (ii) co‐occurrence likelihood. Estimates were validated using species from the larger spatial scales. Estimates were further validated using observations from all larger scale plots surrounding a focal assemblage within a 2 km (Scottish grassland) and 10 km (Swiss forest) radius. The co‐occurrence method was shown to be more accurate resulting in far fewer negative mismatches (i.e. species observed but not predicted), as well as higher proportions of observed and predicted species, relative to the Ellenberg method. Of the species observed in the large‐scale samples, 18% were estimated as part of the smaller scale dark diversity via the co‐occurrence approach relative to 8% for the Ellenberg method for both the Scottish and Swiss data, respectively. These values increased to 67% & 60% and 32% & 35%, respectively, across all observations within a 2 km (Scottish grasslands) and 10 km (Swiss forests) radius. The study demonstrates that dark diversity for a community can be successfully estimated using readily available data, through exploring species co‐occurrence patterns. This work substantiates that habitat‐specific species pools can be accurately quantified and should prove valuable for understanding underlying community processes and improving our knowledge of the mechanisms governing species co‐existence.