Long‐term efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices and transvenous leads. (10th March 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Long‐term efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices and transvenous leads. (10th March 2019)
- Main Title:
- Long‐term efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices and transvenous leads
- Authors:
- Dinshaw, Leon
Schäffer, Benjamin
Akbulak, Özge
Jularic, Mario
Hartmann, Jens
Klatt, Niklas
Dickow, Jannis
Gunawardene, Melanie
Münkler, Paula
Hakmi, Samer
Pecha, Simon
Sultan, Arian
Lüker, Jakob
Pinnschmidt, Hans
Hoffmann, Boris
Gosau, Nils
Eickholt, Christian
Willems, Stephan
Steven, Daniel
Meyer, Christian - Abstract:
- Abstract: Introduction: Long‐term efficacy and safety are uncertain in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) and transvenous leads (TVL) undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Thus, we assessed the outcome of AF ablation in those patients during long‐term follow‐up using continuous atrial rhythm monitoring (CARM). Methods and Results: A total of 190 patients (71.3 ± 10.7 years; 108 (56.8% men) were included in this study. At index procedure 81 (42.6%) patients presented with paroxysmal AF and 109 (57.4%) with persistent AF. The ablation strategy included pulmonary vein isolation in all patients and biatrial ablation of complex fractionated electrograms with additional ablation lines, if appropriate. AF recurrences were assessed by CARM‐ and CIED‐related complications by device follow‐up. After a mean follow‐up of 55.4 ± 38.1 months, freedom of AF was found in 86 (61.4%) and clinical success defined as an AF burden less than or equal to 1% in 101 (72.1%) patients. Freedom of AF was reported in 74.6% and 51.9% ( P = 0.006) and clinical success in 89.8% and 59.3% ( P < 0.001) of patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF, respectively. In 3 of 408 (0.7%) ablation procedures, a TVL malfunction occurred within 90 days after catheter ablation. During long‐term follow‐up 9 (4.7%) patients showed lead dislodgement, 2 (1.1%) lead fracture, and 2 (1.1%) lead insulation defect not related to the ablation procedure. Conclusion:Abstract: Introduction: Long‐term efficacy and safety are uncertain in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) and transvenous leads (TVL) undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Thus, we assessed the outcome of AF ablation in those patients during long‐term follow‐up using continuous atrial rhythm monitoring (CARM). Methods and Results: A total of 190 patients (71.3 ± 10.7 years; 108 (56.8% men) were included in this study. At index procedure 81 (42.6%) patients presented with paroxysmal AF and 109 (57.4%) with persistent AF. The ablation strategy included pulmonary vein isolation in all patients and biatrial ablation of complex fractionated electrograms with additional ablation lines, if appropriate. AF recurrences were assessed by CARM‐ and CIED‐related complications by device follow‐up. After a mean follow‐up of 55.4 ± 38.1 months, freedom of AF was found in 86 (61.4%) and clinical success defined as an AF burden less than or equal to 1% in 101 (72.1%) patients. Freedom of AF was reported in 74.6% and 51.9% ( P = 0.006) and clinical success in 89.8% and 59.3% ( P < 0.001) of patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF, respectively. In 3 of 408 (0.7%) ablation procedures, a TVL malfunction occurred within 90 days after catheter ablation. During long‐term follow‐up 9 (4.7%) patients showed lead dislodgement, 2 (1.1%) lead fracture, and 2 (1.1%) lead insulation defect not related to the ablation procedure. Conclusion: Our findings using CARM demonstrate long‐term efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF in patients with CIED and TVL. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. Volume 30:Number 5(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
- Issue:
- Volume 30:Number 5(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 30, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0030-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 679
- Page End:
- 687
- Publication Date:
- 2019-03-10
- Subjects:
- atrial fibrillation -- cardiac implantable electronic device -- radiofrequency catheter ablation -- transvenous lead
Blood vessels -- Physiology -- Periodicals
Electrophysiology -- Periodicals
Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals
612.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1111/jce.13890 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1045-3873
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4954.866000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 17754.xml